Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dark Sun as a Hopepunk Setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rainbow Scissors" data-source="post: 9741408" data-attributes="member: 7052820"><p>There's not anything to hide from. You bolded part of my statement, but that is neither the context nor the meaning of the entirety of my statement. I feel that you are taking an antagonistic stance against something that I am not even saying.</p><p></p><p>Your accusation that I said that someone writing about evil should not write is not accurate. What I said was, <u>"It is my view that, if the person writing the book </u><strong><u>feels the need to apologize for writing the book, then maybe they shouldn't write the book.</u></strong> By the same token, if the person is using page count to tell me what is badwrongfun but also simultaneously making money on selling me something that they feel I shouldn't be playing... I guess it kinda feels like buying drugs from a substance abuse counselor and then needing to have a meeting with them about it the next day."</p><p></p><p>I bolded the same part that you bolded so that it could be compared to the underlined (and more complete part) of what I said. The bolded part in isolation is a very different thing than what I actually said.</p><p></p><p>So, how is it different?</p><p></p><p>There's a big different between saying,"...a writer who writes about how evil things are evil shouldn't write..." versus saying that I would questioning the concept of someone writing a Dark Sun setting and selling it to me when that same someone does not want Dark Sun to be Dark Sun. That is not saying to not write about evil. That is commenting that someone who were to choose to create, sell, write, and participate in publishing content that they espouse as being badwrongfun content is odd to me. Additionally, I -as a prospective customer of a product- would prefer a product that does what it tells me it does and is what it advertises itself to be rather that a product that goes the extra mile to no longer do what I expect it to do. I expect that a setting book presents a setting to me.</p><p></p><p>I'm not even sure what you mean by "acknowledge that it can be done..."</p><p>I have not said that your proposal cannot be done. I have said literally the opposite: that it can be done, and it is even an idea that could be very fun to play.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, it can be done. </p><p></p><p>I feel that you are trying to attribute a point of view to me that is not one that I have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rainbow Scissors, post: 9741408, member: 7052820"] There's not anything to hide from. You bolded part of my statement, but that is neither the context nor the meaning of the entirety of my statement. I feel that you are taking an antagonistic stance against something that I am not even saying. Your accusation that I said that someone writing about evil should not write is not accurate. What I said was, [U]"It is my view that, if the person writing the book [/U][B][U]feels the need to apologize for writing the book, then maybe they shouldn't write the book.[/U][/B] By the same token, if the person is using page count to tell me what is badwrongfun but also simultaneously making money on selling me something that they feel I shouldn't be playing... I guess it kinda feels like buying drugs from a substance abuse counselor and then needing to have a meeting with them about it the next day." I bolded the same part that you bolded so that it could be compared to the underlined (and more complete part) of what I said. The bolded part in isolation is a very different thing than what I actually said. So, how is it different? There's a big different between saying,"...a writer who writes about how evil things are evil shouldn't write..." versus saying that I would questioning the concept of someone writing a Dark Sun setting and selling it to me when that same someone does not want Dark Sun to be Dark Sun. That is not saying to not write about evil. That is commenting that someone who were to choose to create, sell, write, and participate in publishing content that they espouse as being badwrongfun content is odd to me. Additionally, I -as a prospective customer of a product- would prefer a product that does what it tells me it does and is what it advertises itself to be rather that a product that goes the extra mile to no longer do what I expect it to do. I expect that a setting book presents a setting to me. I'm not even sure what you mean by "acknowledge that it can be done..." I have not said that your proposal cannot be done. I have said literally the opposite: that it can be done, and it is even an idea that could be very fun to play. So, yes, it can be done. I feel that you are trying to attribute a point of view to me that is not one that I have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dark Sun as a Hopepunk Setting
Top