Menu
Home
Post new thread
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Community
Post new thread
Create wiki page
Community supporters
All threads
Latest threads
Hot threads
New posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Chat/Discord
Podcast
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Post new thread
Create wiki page
Community supporters
All threads
Latest threads
Hot threads
New posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
COMING SOON! --
Archetype Anthology: A Dozen Archetypes for D&D 5th Edition
on Kickstarter! From dual-wielding tempests to planar explorers -- a softcover collection of new archetypes for your 5th Edition game!
log in
or
register
to remove this ad
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dark Sun doesn't actually need Psionics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8094837" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>One of the issues I'm seeing here is that there are two different relationships between preserving and defiling magic; the 2e rules work very differently from either the 4e rules or the books. And how well psionics fit is in part a question of which you see as the core source material.</p><p></p><p>In the 2e game Preserving is good magic, defiling is bad magic, period. Defilers are on a quicker path to power - but all that means is a favourable XP track in a game with exponential XP. The choice between preserver and defiler was an irrevocable one made at first level. And preservers are poor, put-upon souls, subject to fear and hatred for doing absolutely nothing wrong.</p><p></p><p>In both the books and in 4e defiling was an option that every arcane spellcaster had and could use. It wasn't two separate classes, but defiling was something any mage could do - and did under stress. Their life, for example, was worth more than that shrub and any grass they might be standing on. No mage <em>had</em> to defile, but every mage could and was likely to under sufficient pressure. And fear of mages was much more justified because they all might defile.</p><p></p><p>Under the 2e paradigm having good but feared mages, neutral psionicists, and bad and hated mages makes reasonable sense. Preservers are genuinely innocent and you can thus play a supernatural character that doesn't have to deal with that with psionics. Under the books/4e paradigm where preservers are people sticking to the straight and narrow but can defile at any time psionicists are almost cheating by getting power without consequences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 8094837, member: 87792"] One of the issues I'm seeing here is that there are two different relationships between preserving and defiling magic; the 2e rules work very differently from either the 4e rules or the books. And how well psionics fit is in part a question of which you see as the core source material. In the 2e game Preserving is good magic, defiling is bad magic, period. Defilers are on a quicker path to power - but all that means is a favourable XP track in a game with exponential XP. The choice between preserver and defiler was an irrevocable one made at first level. And preservers are poor, put-upon souls, subject to fear and hatred for doing absolutely nothing wrong. In both the books and in 4e defiling was an option that every arcane spellcaster had and could use. It wasn't two separate classes, but defiling was something any mage could do - and did under stress. Their life, for example, was worth more than that shrub and any grass they might be standing on. No mage [I]had[/I] to defile, but every mage could and was likely to under sufficient pressure. And fear of mages was much more justified because they all might defile. Under the 2e paradigm having good but feared mages, neutral psionicists, and bad and hated mages makes reasonable sense. Preservers are genuinely innocent and you can thus play a supernatural character that doesn't have to deal with that with psionics. Under the books/4e paradigm where preservers are people sticking to the straight and narrow but can defile at any time psionicists are almost cheating by getting power without consequences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dark Sun doesn't actually need Psionics
Top