Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Connorsrpg" data-source="post: 5253068" data-attributes="member: 19265">I too love the idea of themes. Takes me back to 2e kits too. Whilst many of those became Paragon Paths / Prestige Classes, those that were simply a definition of style of background were lost. Now we have them back <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I too am thinking of ideas for themes for my game. I noticed two of the early 4e Dragon articles went to great lengths to describe Gladiators and Assassins as 'roles' not classes. If only they had the idea of themes then <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Anyway, the articles would be of great benefit for PCs that choose similar themes. I love the idea of a concept being cross-class. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />C</blockquote>