Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dark Sun, problematic content, and 5E…
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 8962357" data-attributes="member: 6802378"><p>And I wonder if their choice is based in prudence and good sense, or in irrational fear. Is there really any risk of a possible controversy? Was it their choise, or an order from the top, or from outside? Then, in this case, who and why? I can understand in the entertaiment industry there are some rules of political correction, but I see these rules are changing too much in the last years, and not always with a right coherence, and more once because suspicious motives. </p><p></p><p>Is it a marketing choice based in the good sense, or submission to an ideological agenda? If it the second reason, then I start to worry, and more when more times in the past WotC has talked about "inclusive content". I fear because a thing is told but after the opposite happenes. I am watching several exemples within the entertaiment industry because the companies are losing money because they stopped to be ideologically neutral. </p><p></p><p>Who could start a controversy linked with DS setting, toxic players, toxic creators in DMGuild or a lobby with no link with the hobby? Kalidnay is in DMGuild, because it was a dread domain within Ravenloft setting. </p><p></p><p>Really have modern sensibilities changed, or is anybody talking in the name of those modern sensibilities? But what if that anybody is not the true voice of the majority of the public opinion?</p><p></p><p>Have we lost the good sense? Are we allowing the imposition of new taboos without questioning anything? </p><p></p><p>What are the criteria for saying when anything can be potentially problematic? who imposes those criteria? Are those criteria really reasonable, or is it a new tiranny in the name of politically correct?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't be enough a disclaimer section explaining the players should understand the respect for the human dignity or anything like this?</p><p></p><p>Why could DS be potentially problematic, but not Ixatlan or Blizzard's Diablo (videogame)?</p><p></p><p>It is not only about DS but that "respect for the modern sensibilities" could influence in more D&D titles in the future. How can I know what are the true "modern sensibilities"? Maybe they are only a little group talking in the name of the rest of population, but this doesn't mean the true majority shared the same opinion. </p><p></p><p>* In "Beyond the Witchlight" some children had to be rescued, and I don't say more to avoid spoilers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LuisCarlos17f, post: 8962357, member: 6802378"] And I wonder if their choice is based in prudence and good sense, or in irrational fear. Is there really any risk of a possible controversy? Was it their choise, or an order from the top, or from outside? Then, in this case, who and why? I can understand in the entertaiment industry there are some rules of political correction, but I see these rules are changing too much in the last years, and not always with a right coherence, and more once because suspicious motives. Is it a marketing choice based in the good sense, or submission to an ideological agenda? If it the second reason, then I start to worry, and more when more times in the past WotC has talked about "inclusive content". I fear because a thing is told but after the opposite happenes. I am watching several exemples within the entertaiment industry because the companies are losing money because they stopped to be ideologically neutral. Who could start a controversy linked with DS setting, toxic players, toxic creators in DMGuild or a lobby with no link with the hobby? Kalidnay is in DMGuild, because it was a dread domain within Ravenloft setting. Really have modern sensibilities changed, or is anybody talking in the name of those modern sensibilities? But what if that anybody is not the true voice of the majority of the public opinion? Have we lost the good sense? Are we allowing the imposition of new taboos without questioning anything? What are the criteria for saying when anything can be potentially problematic? who imposes those criteria? Are those criteria really reasonable, or is it a new tiranny in the name of politically correct? Wouldn't be enough a disclaimer section explaining the players should understand the respect for the human dignity or anything like this? Why could DS be potentially problematic, but not Ixatlan or Blizzard's Diablo (videogame)? It is not only about DS but that "respect for the modern sensibilities" could influence in more D&D titles in the future. How can I know what are the true "modern sensibilities"? Maybe they are only a little group talking in the name of the rest of population, but this doesn't mean the true majority shared the same opinion. * In "Beyond the Witchlight" some children had to be rescued, and I don't say more to avoid spoilers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dark Sun, problematic content, and 5E…
Top