Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blacksad" data-source="post: 304435" data-attributes="member: 1359">err, is that hard to add 10 or 20 to a number?Vs a target AC of 25:-on a natural -10 critical failure (roll of 1 then roll of 11 or more)-if you do 25: ordinary success-if you do 35: good-45: amazingVs a target AC of 37-critical failure on -10-37: ordinary-47: good-57: amazingisn't it easier that way?I think that some addition to d20 could be nice, but to try to put back all the modifier on the attacker, or to do a classless system seems too much work for little result:-you'll loose the easy compatibility between product-you'll need to re-work the advancement rules, because a rank in d20 doesn't equal a rank in Alternity-you won't have a PHBat this point you could as well keep the alternity system, it is good IMO, and if you have ever played D&amp;D 2nd edition it is very quickly learned.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blacksad, post: 304435, member: 1359"] err, is that hard to add 10 or 20 to a number? Vs a target AC of 25: -on a natural -10 critical failure (roll of 1 then roll of 11 or more) -if you do 25: ordinary success -if you do 35: good -45: amazing Vs a target AC of 37 -critical failure on -10 -37: ordinary -47: good -57: amazing isn't it easier that way? I think that some addition to d20 could be nice, but to try to put back all the modifier on the attacker, or to do a classless system seems too much work for little result: -you'll loose the easy compatibility between product -you'll need to re-work the advancement rules, because a rank in d20 doesn't equal a rank in Alternity -you won't have a PHB at this point you could as well keep the alternity system, it is good IMO, and if you have ever played D&D 2nd edition it is very quickly learned. [/QUOTE]

Verification