Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dave Noonan Responds about Wizard Implements
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 3781838" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>Wulf, you know that I really respect you, so I hope you'll take this in the spirit it's offered.</p><p></p><p>I think you're looking for the worst-case scenario here, and then assuming that's the way it's going to go.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it's true there weren't endless splatbooks of nothing but deities and domains. <em>But</em>, there <em>were</em> plenty of new deities, and new domains, sprinkled <em>throughout</em> the books. So while the design of new deities and domains on one's own was easy, clearly there was also still room--and even demand--for the designers to do some of that work themselves.</p><p></p><p>Why, then, assume that the new implements and traditions to which Dave refers are going to occupy a book of their own? Honestly, I'd be <em>stunned</em> were that the case. I expect to see them treated much like feats and PrCs were: That is, in any book where it's appropriate, you'll probably find a handful of them.</p><p></p><p>Just like gods, or domains, or PrCs, or feats, or damn near everything else in 3E. In 3E, it <em>would</em> have been possible to fill a book with just new deities and domains. (In the "brief write-up sense, not the <em>Deities and Demigods</em> sense.) Just as it's almost certainly going to be <em>possible</em> to fill a book with implements and traditions. The fact that it's possible doesn't make the original basis poor design, nor does it mean WotC's actually going to do it. I think the latter is just as likely in 4E as the former was in 3E.</p><p></p><p>Honestly? I think most of the concern some people are expressing over this are definitely making mountains out of teacups, or tempests in molehills, or however one wants to phrase it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Much ado about, if not nothing, than very little.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 3781838, member: 1288"] Wulf, you know that I really respect you, so I hope you'll take this in the spirit it's offered. I think you're looking for the worst-case scenario here, and then assuming that's the way it's going to go. Yes, it's true there weren't endless splatbooks of nothing but deities and domains. [i]But[/i], there [i]were[/i] plenty of new deities, and new domains, sprinkled [i]throughout[/i] the books. So while the design of new deities and domains on one's own was easy, clearly there was also still room--and even demand--for the designers to do some of that work themselves. Why, then, assume that the new implements and traditions to which Dave refers are going to occupy a book of their own? Honestly, I'd be [i]stunned[/i] were that the case. I expect to see them treated much like feats and PrCs were: That is, in any book where it's appropriate, you'll probably find a handful of them. Just like gods, or domains, or PrCs, or feats, or damn near everything else in 3E. In 3E, it [i]would[/i] have been possible to fill a book with just new deities and domains. (In the "brief write-up sense, not the [i]Deities and Demigods[/i] sense.) Just as it's almost certainly going to be [i]possible[/i] to fill a book with implements and traditions. The fact that it's possible doesn't make the original basis poor design, nor does it mean WotC's actually going to do it. I think the latter is just as likely in 4E as the former was in 3E. Honestly? I think most of the concern some people are expressing over this are definitely making mountains out of teacups, or tempests in molehills, or however one wants to phrase it. ;) Much ado about, if not nothing, than very little. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dave Noonan Responds about Wizard Implements
Top