Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
David Noonan on 4E "Cloudwatching" (Added Dave's newest comment from his blog)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shortman McLeod" data-source="post: 3755867" data-attributes="member: 53748"><p>I agree with you; the WotC designers do genuinely believe they are improving the game (and perhaps they are; heck, we haven't seen 4e yet).</p><p></p><p>But my point was that it is nonsense to suggest that the introduction of 4e was motivated by ANYTHING other than profit. The suits at Hasbro looked at the balance sheet and said, "3.5 isn't profitable anymore. Time for 4.0." </p><p></p><p>And honestly, that's fine. They're a corporation; they need to be profitable to survive. But please don't start burying us in pro-4e and anti-3.5 propaganda and pretend that this is all a matter of "evolution of game design." It's about bucks, as the introduction of a new product always is. The fact that the WotC designers are excited about the new product and believe it is an improvement doesn't change that.</p><p></p><p>Put it another way: if 3.5 had been burning up sales charts and raking in millions of $$$, do you honestly think we'd be seeing 4e now? And do you honestly think WotC designers would be publicly musing about how awkward 3.5 is to play and how difficult it is to DM?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shortman McLeod, post: 3755867, member: 53748"] I agree with you; the WotC designers do genuinely believe they are improving the game (and perhaps they are; heck, we haven't seen 4e yet). But my point was that it is nonsense to suggest that the introduction of 4e was motivated by ANYTHING other than profit. The suits at Hasbro looked at the balance sheet and said, "3.5 isn't profitable anymore. Time for 4.0." And honestly, that's fine. They're a corporation; they need to be profitable to survive. But please don't start burying us in pro-4e and anti-3.5 propaganda and pretend that this is all a matter of "evolution of game design." It's about bucks, as the introduction of a new product always is. The fact that the WotC designers are excited about the new product and believe it is an improvement doesn't change that. Put it another way: if 3.5 had been burning up sales charts and raking in millions of $$$, do you honestly think we'd be seeing 4e now? And do you honestly think WotC designers would be publicly musing about how awkward 3.5 is to play and how difficult it is to DM? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
David Noonan on 4E "Cloudwatching" (Added Dave's newest comment from his blog)
Top