Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tzeentch" data-source="post: 1243946" data-attributes="member: 13222">-- An author is not an unbiased source. I mean really, how more biased can you actually get with a book? As an author myself you'll have to excuse me if I don't place a lot of stock in the spirited defense of a project by someone that has a very real emotional and economic committment to its success (even if it's just the prospect of future contracts for supplements).-- Until the book comes out and we can get some actual impartial reviews we are relying on the material that FFG's marketing folks put together to entice us to get the book. That material failed to entice Grumby (and presumably others). Getting snippy about it doesn't make that material look any cooler I'm afraid, and claiming it's actual misinformation is simply hyperbole.-- If you are truly concerned about people misinterpreting the preview material I suggest bringing this to the attention of your contacts at FFG and let them know some people may be getting the wrong idea about the setting from the current material (lack of context, confusingly sampled text, whatever).-- IMO it's generally counterproductive to tease prospective customers with your "inside sources" and attack them with information that only people with NDA's can check. I know it annoys me when I'm on the consumer side of things, especially if I was being called a liar by a company representative!</blockquote>