Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DDEX1-5 The Courting of Fire GM notes and discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ricochet" data-source="post: 6737554" data-attributes="member: 2024"><p><strong>The Courting of Fire questions/comments (spoilers)</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by KippleSnacks:</strong></p><p></p><p>I ran into a few issues while running Courting of Fire, though was able to run with it sufficiently enough that the group enjoyed the session (which is what matters), but would love some assistance for if/when I run it again.</p><p> </p><p>1) Within the XP rewards section, there is a list for a "Spy" and an enemy, as well as a rather burly Bandit Captain that does not appear to be used anywhere. </p><p> </p><p>2) My players got super interested with that "Third person" Markoth saw Tibeem and Spirnik with, and without any further explanation for me in the adventure, had to adlib it.</p><p> </p><p>3) As for finding the map to the circle of scales, the adventure states that if they have issues finding the map, the Lord Sage can tell them the way. I see this as likely just upsetting players in a "Why didn't he just tell us?" sort of way. My players didn't even think of scouring grocery stores (and seriously, we wouldent know how many there could possibly be in Phlan). In the end, I let them combine an Investigation and a Cartography check between two characters to create their own map from the two books that got left behind, which wound up pleasing my players greatly.</p><p> </p><p>4) One of (though not the only) the most logical things for a good party to do with the scale at the end (especially believing it to be an artifact rather than a measely 300 gp art piece) would be to let the undead druid remain as a guardian and reseal the temple, however that is rough screwing the party out of 300 gp (as the adventure doesn't give very much otherwise) for doing a right/logical thing (as they didn't trust the Lord Sage to keep it because he was dumped by the idiot that is Spirnik).</p><p> </p><p>Otherwise, great fun, we had a warlock, a wizard, a sorcerer, two bards, and a cleric, so interesting to see problems get solved without any super brute force (well, at least after they decided to Leroy Jenkins the first zombie room...).</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Skerrit:</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Its a reference to a DDEX1-6 The Scroll Thief. That should probably be noted in the adventure.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by KippleSnacks:</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, went and read through the scroll thief, seems much more coherent now then... Though my party did have fun making Evelyn, Spirnik's sage friend who unwittingly helped with draconic translations, cry in front of the Lord Sage... They also made Spirnik cry before bringing him to Phlan... I think that party liked making NPCs cry.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by OrganicDoom:</strong></p><p></p><p>Were there any magic items gained from this mod. One 300gp scale split between th party seems pretty low?</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Skerrit:</strong></p><p></p><p>There is other gp and items beyond the scale.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by KippleSnacks:</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Absolutely, and nobody was very disatisfied (especially the guy who got the Ring of Fire Resist).</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by AlHazred:</strong></p><p></p><p>Does that mean this should be run before Scroll Thief? I've got a pretty consistent group at my hobby store for game days, and Scroll Thief was going to be this Saturday's module du jour. If it will add something to run Courting of Fire first, I'll do that, I'd just like to know.</p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Skerrit:</strong></p><p></p><p>Its doable either way, but in general, the adventures often reference each other (and so occur in a rough chronilogical order that occurs in the same order as their release). The references are small and matter really only if you are very invested (which of course we encourage) or if you are not good at suspending your disbelief since an event is occuring out of order.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Pauper:</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Spoiler alert!</p><p> </p><p></p><p><strong>Show</strong></p><p>[sblock]The three are actually noted, by name, in Secrets of Sokol Keep (DDEX1-2) as being in the Laughing Goblin prior to the bar fight. A suitably charismatic PC might even convince them to share their names, though the text of the adventure suggests they're only interested in keeping to themselves.[/sblock] </p><p>Again, nothing wrong with running the adventures in any order, but running them in release order allows for little 'hey, remember that guy' moments like this.</p><p> </p><p>--</p><p>Pauper</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Uthrac:</strong></p><p></p><p>We had fun with this adventure, however ...</p><p> </p><p>1. Specific observation: My PCs felt bad for the escaped thief. He offered to return the books, turned over his treasure ... but it's pretty clear that returning him for his crime of theft (and guilt by association) is death ... so the PCs have the moral dilema of returning a 19-year-old thief to be executed and claim their reward or let him go and get nothing. We hate it when mechanical rewards are tied to roleplaying decisions. (i.e. If he could offer them a tip to a secreted stash worth the same as the reward, that would shift the focus away from getting paid.) What really dragged the adventure down was that, after going through the RP with the thief, the PCs meet the guardian ... and are immediately faced with another choice ... leave the undead guardians of a thing they didn't even know about, or kill him and take it back for cash. The two encounters were interesting, but being similar and back-to-back was overkill. </p><p> </p><p>2. General observation: Expedition adventures are becoming formulaic. Do some investigation, then dungeon crawl. It would be nice to see more variety (as in DDEX1-1).</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by akaddk:</strong></p><p></p><p>I had two assassins in the party. They hung back out of the light's radius. Door that Spernik was hiding behind was opened. Dialogue started. Then... thunk, thunk. Two assassin's arrows with surprise came out of the darkness.</p><p> </p><p>Sigh.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Pauper:</strong></p><p></p><p>@Uthrac -- It does seem like many of the early adventures have a similar setup, but many of the Year 1 adventures in LFR were pretty formulaic as well, which is one reason they didn't get a lot of replay (at least in our area). Heck, I recall one 1-1 level LFR mod (IMPI 1-1) where the initial encounter had pretty much nothing to do with the rest of the adventure!</p><p> </p><p>Still, I wouldn't mind seeing an AL module constructed along the lines of BALD 1-2 "The Night I Let the Undead Out" or CORM 1-1 "The Black Knight of Arabel" Even DALE 1-1 "The Prospect" got some replay, despite being a pretty simple module, because it led into an interesting story series.</p><p> </p><p>Part of the problem might well be that we've basically only got one 'story area' right now, so the adventures for that story area are going to seem pretty same-y until the bigger plot becomes more apparent. After all 'investigating in Westgate' has a different feel from 'investigating in Waterdeep' or 'investigating in Baldur's Gate'; right now, pretty much all the investigations are in or around Phlan, which helps make the investigations feel same-y, because the same spots (the Stojanow Gate, the Laughing Goblin, Valhingen Graveyard) keep coming up. Some players may appreciate the familiarity and 'getting to know the area', but others may find it less interesting.</p><p> </p><p>--</p><p>Pauper</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by TheDireOne:</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p>I really like the Expedition adventures flow. I ran 6 of them this past weekend and really loved piecing the bits together as I went along. The investigation really lends to the role playing aspect of the game. Gives a real meaning to skills and the rolls made. I do agree that 1-1 had great variety. Also I really like the faction element. My defense of a caged fellow to be released in opposition to the party was another great RP moment. Its a great add to the normal party actions.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Alphastream:</strong></p><p></p><p>When I read this adventure I was a bit worried with the investigations. In play, however, they actually work very well. The scenes are generally interesting to players and there are a lot of bits the DM can use to make the scenes fun. Several of the scenes can be used to short-cut the investigation if time is running low, or to lead to other scenes if things are going too quickly. I've ran the adventure about 5 times and really ended up liking it. </p><p> </p><p>There are some places where players can get dissatisfied. The map is one, but I think that's easy - if you need for them to just be able to get there, it is far better to have an action the PCs take trigger this. Any of the scenes could produce the actual map. Or, information that is just enough for the sage to be able to create a map. You never want the players to feel they wasted their time (and I don't think the adventure is meaning to suggest that happen. I think it is suggesting that the DM improvise if needed.). </p><p> </p><p>The ending is another. Here I again ended up liking that it is in my hands. Sometimes they want to murder the guy... and if that's great then I facilitate it. Sometimes I have him do some fast-talking, and then the kobolds turn against him... which is a cool choice for the PCs whether to now save him or continue the original plan. You can get some nice morals/alignment moments from this. I like to think of the scene having an invisible throttle on how much I let the PCs know that he might be saved/redeemed and it is a lot of fun. The very end is similar. Sometimes players don't want to open the door. If that will be satisfying to them, no problem, done. If they seem really hesitant and aren't enjoying that decision (but think they have to make it), that's where I'll provide some information or encourage checks that tell them some additional bits and make the decision more fun. For example, that someone seems to be involved other than the players here and will probably come looking. That the factions may want whatever is inside. I adjust to taste and keep the scene from being a disappointment. So far, every run has been fun even though the tables have made very different choices.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ricochet, post: 6737554, member: 2024"] [b]The Courting of Fire questions/comments (spoilers)[/b] [b]Originally posted by KippleSnacks:[/b] I ran into a few issues while running Courting of Fire, though was able to run with it sufficiently enough that the group enjoyed the session (which is what matters), but would love some assistance for if/when I run it again. 1) Within the XP rewards section, there is a list for a "Spy" and an enemy, as well as a rather burly Bandit Captain that does not appear to be used anywhere. 2) My players got super interested with that "Third person" Markoth saw Tibeem and Spirnik with, and without any further explanation for me in the adventure, had to adlib it. 3) As for finding the map to the circle of scales, the adventure states that if they have issues finding the map, the Lord Sage can tell them the way. I see this as likely just upsetting players in a "Why didn't he just tell us?" sort of way. My players didn't even think of scouring grocery stores (and seriously, we wouldent know how many there could possibly be in Phlan). In the end, I let them combine an Investigation and a Cartography check between two characters to create their own map from the two books that got left behind, which wound up pleasing my players greatly. 4) One of (though not the only) the most logical things for a good party to do with the scale at the end (especially believing it to be an artifact rather than a measely 300 gp art piece) would be to let the undead druid remain as a guardian and reseal the temple, however that is rough screwing the party out of 300 gp (as the adventure doesn't give very much otherwise) for doing a right/logical thing (as they didn't trust the Lord Sage to keep it because he was dumped by the idiot that is Spirnik). Otherwise, great fun, we had a warlock, a wizard, a sorcerer, two bards, and a cleric, so interesting to see problems get solved without any super brute force (well, at least after they decided to Leroy Jenkins the first zombie room...). [b]Originally posted by Skerrit:[/b] Its a reference to a DDEX1-6 The Scroll Thief. That should probably be noted in the adventure. [b]Originally posted by KippleSnacks:[/b] Well, went and read through the scroll thief, seems much more coherent now then... Though my party did have fun making Evelyn, Spirnik's sage friend who unwittingly helped with draconic translations, cry in front of the Lord Sage... They also made Spirnik cry before bringing him to Phlan... I think that party liked making NPCs cry. [b]Originally posted by OrganicDoom:[/b] Were there any magic items gained from this mod. One 300gp scale split between th party seems pretty low? [b]Originally posted by Skerrit:[/b] There is other gp and items beyond the scale. [b]Originally posted by KippleSnacks:[/b] Absolutely, and nobody was very disatisfied (especially the guy who got the Ring of Fire Resist). [b]Originally posted by AlHazred:[/b] Does that mean this should be run before Scroll Thief? I've got a pretty consistent group at my hobby store for game days, and Scroll Thief was going to be this Saturday's module du jour. If it will add something to run Courting of Fire first, I'll do that, I'd just like to know. [b]Originally posted by Skerrit:[/b] Its doable either way, but in general, the adventures often reference each other (and so occur in a rough chronilogical order that occurs in the same order as their release). The references are small and matter really only if you are very invested (which of course we encourage) or if you are not good at suspending your disbelief since an event is occuring out of order. [b]Originally posted by Pauper:[/b] Spoiler alert! [b]Show[/b] [sblock]The three are actually noted, by name, in Secrets of Sokol Keep (DDEX1-2) as being in the Laughing Goblin prior to the bar fight. A suitably charismatic PC might even convince them to share their names, though the text of the adventure suggests they're only interested in keeping to themselves.[/sblock] Again, nothing wrong with running the adventures in any order, but running them in release order allows for little 'hey, remember that guy' moments like this. -- Pauper [b]Originally posted by Uthrac:[/b] We had fun with this adventure, however ... 1. Specific observation: My PCs felt bad for the escaped thief. He offered to return the books, turned over his treasure ... but it's pretty clear that returning him for his crime of theft (and guilt by association) is death ... so the PCs have the moral dilema of returning a 19-year-old thief to be executed and claim their reward or let him go and get nothing. We hate it when mechanical rewards are tied to roleplaying decisions. (i.e. If he could offer them a tip to a secreted stash worth the same as the reward, that would shift the focus away from getting paid.) What really dragged the adventure down was that, after going through the RP with the thief, the PCs meet the guardian ... and are immediately faced with another choice ... leave the undead guardians of a thing they didn't even know about, or kill him and take it back for cash. The two encounters were interesting, but being similar and back-to-back was overkill. 2. General observation: Expedition adventures are becoming formulaic. Do some investigation, then dungeon crawl. It would be nice to see more variety (as in DDEX1-1). [b]Originally posted by akaddk:[/b] I had two assassins in the party. They hung back out of the light's radius. Door that Spernik was hiding behind was opened. Dialogue started. Then... thunk, thunk. Two assassin's arrows with surprise came out of the darkness. Sigh. [b]Originally posted by Pauper:[/b] @Uthrac -- It does seem like many of the early adventures have a similar setup, but many of the Year 1 adventures in LFR were pretty formulaic as well, which is one reason they didn't get a lot of replay (at least in our area). Heck, I recall one 1-1 level LFR mod (IMPI 1-1) where the initial encounter had pretty much nothing to do with the rest of the adventure! Still, I wouldn't mind seeing an AL module constructed along the lines of BALD 1-2 "The Night I Let the Undead Out" or CORM 1-1 "The Black Knight of Arabel" Even DALE 1-1 "The Prospect" got some replay, despite being a pretty simple module, because it led into an interesting story series. Part of the problem might well be that we've basically only got one 'story area' right now, so the adventures for that story area are going to seem pretty same-y until the bigger plot becomes more apparent. After all 'investigating in Westgate' has a different feel from 'investigating in Waterdeep' or 'investigating in Baldur's Gate'; right now, pretty much all the investigations are in or around Phlan, which helps make the investigations feel same-y, because the same spots (the Stojanow Gate, the Laughing Goblin, Valhingen Graveyard) keep coming up. Some players may appreciate the familiarity and 'getting to know the area', but others may find it less interesting. -- Pauper [b]Originally posted by TheDireOne:[/b] I really like the Expedition adventures flow. I ran 6 of them this past weekend and really loved piecing the bits together as I went along. The investigation really lends to the role playing aspect of the game. Gives a real meaning to skills and the rolls made. I do agree that 1-1 had great variety. Also I really like the faction element. My defense of a caged fellow to be released in opposition to the party was another great RP moment. Its a great add to the normal party actions. [b]Originally posted by Alphastream:[/b] When I read this adventure I was a bit worried with the investigations. In play, however, they actually work very well. The scenes are generally interesting to players and there are a lot of bits the DM can use to make the scenes fun. Several of the scenes can be used to short-cut the investigation if time is running low, or to lead to other scenes if things are going too quickly. I've ran the adventure about 5 times and really ended up liking it. There are some places where players can get dissatisfied. The map is one, but I think that's easy - if you need for them to just be able to get there, it is far better to have an action the PCs take trigger this. Any of the scenes could produce the actual map. Or, information that is just enough for the sage to be able to create a map. You never want the players to feel they wasted their time (and I don't think the adventure is meaning to suggest that happen. I think it is suggesting that the DM improvise if needed.). The ending is another. Here I again ended up liking that it is in my hands. Sometimes they want to murder the guy... and if that's great then I facilitate it. Sometimes I have him do some fast-talking, and then the kobolds turn against him... which is a cool choice for the PCs whether to now save him or continue the original plan. You can get some nice morals/alignment moments from this. I like to think of the scene having an invisible throttle on how much I let the PCs know that he might be saved/redeemed and it is a lot of fun. The very end is similar. Sometimes players don't want to open the door. If that will be satisfying to them, no problem, done. If they seem really hesitant and aren't enjoying that decision (but think they have to make it), that's where I'll provide some information or encourage checks that tell them some additional bits and make the decision more fun. For example, that someone seems to be involved other than the players here and will probably come looking. That the factions may want whatever is inside. I adjust to taste and keep the scene from being a disappointment. So far, every run has been fun even though the tables have made very different choices. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DDEX1-5 The Courting of Fire GM notes and discussion
Top