Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="triqui" data-source="post: 5991928" data-attributes="member: 57948">A good society that wipes out what they consider evil might not be fine. They might be killing their neiighbours for a reason, and even then, that reason might be wrong.A group of LG templars that burn witches in pyres came to mind. They really really consider witchcraft to be sinful, dangerous, and evil. But the act might be &quot;too much&quot; for a True Neutral (specally a true neutral witch <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )EDIT: Plus, the good society can go too far even without wiping out evil. Let's suppose a group of chaotic good people, who wants to end poverty in the world. They decide they are going to distribute wealth among the poor. They take the land from the rich and wealthy, which do not need it except to&nbsp; further increase their greed, they take the king's crown and jewel and melt it to feed the hungry, and they make everything to be shared and committed to the Greater Good. Let's call this Good association &quot;communists&quot;. I think some people might consider that their &quot;good deeds&quot; aren't really that good. For example, the owner of those lands and jewels.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="triqui, post: 5991928, member: 57948"] A good society that wipes out what they [I]consider [/I]evil might not be fine. They might be killing their neiighbours for a reason, and even then, that reason might be wrong. A group of LG templars that burn witches in pyres came to mind. They really really consider witchcraft to be sinful, dangerous, and evil. But the act might be "too much" for a True Neutral (specally a true neutral witch :) ) EDIT: Plus, the good society can go too far even without wiping out evil. Let's suppose a group of chaotic good people, who wants to end poverty in the world. They decide they are going to distribute wealth among the poor. They take the land from the rich and wealthy, which do not need it except to further increase their greed, they take the king's crown and jewel and melt it to feed the hungry, and they make everything to be shared and committed to the Greater Good. Let's call this Good association "communists". I think some people might consider that their "good deeds" aren't really that good. For example, the owner of those lands and jewels. [/QUOTE]

Verification