Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dealing with essential impossibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 3064583" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>While I don't prefer this kind of game, many DMs here on ENWorld run successful campaigns based on this premise. So the campaign is not in and of itself problematic.These things happen. Some encounters push a party to the brink. This in and of itself is not indicative of a problem.Here is an actual issue. The DM from his comment seems to still be judging encounter difficulty based on standard CRs, when he's modified his game so as to make them relatively useless. Without a standard array of magical powers, he's going to have to eyeball each encounter and guage the difficulty himself.</p><p></p><p>I'd suggest that you politely and in a friendly fashion point out to him that the CR rating is built on the assumption of standard wealth, and therefore he may need to re-evaluate monsters based on his own judgment, rather than relying on CRs.</p><p></p><p>I honestly don't think there's a serious problem at this point. Your DM may be quite willing and capable of tailoring his monster selection to your actual power levels. His comment indicates that he may not have thought of this necessity thus far, but does not necesarily indicate he is unwilling or incapable.</p><p></p><p>Give it some time. If, after five or six more sessions, he's TPK'd you guys several times and still clings to CRs as a justification for his choices ("These guys are only CR6! They're perfectly appropriate!") then you have a legitimate issue to deal with. Until then, consider it a DM's growing pains, as he learns how to handle the kind of campaign he wants to run.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 3064583, member: 707"] While I don't prefer this kind of game, many DMs here on ENWorld run successful campaigns based on this premise. So the campaign is not in and of itself problematic.These things happen. Some encounters push a party to the brink. This in and of itself is not indicative of a problem.Here is an actual issue. The DM from his comment seems to still be judging encounter difficulty based on standard CRs, when he's modified his game so as to make them relatively useless. Without a standard array of magical powers, he's going to have to eyeball each encounter and guage the difficulty himself. I'd suggest that you politely and in a friendly fashion point out to him that the CR rating is built on the assumption of standard wealth, and therefore he may need to re-evaluate monsters based on his own judgment, rather than relying on CRs. I honestly don't think there's a serious problem at this point. Your DM may be quite willing and capable of tailoring his monster selection to your actual power levels. His comment indicates that he may not have thought of this necessity thus far, but does not necesarily indicate he is unwilling or incapable. Give it some time. If, after five or six more sessions, he's TPK'd you guys several times and still clings to CRs as a justification for his choices ("These guys are only CR6! They're perfectly appropriate!") then you have a legitimate issue to deal with. Until then, consider it a DM's growing pains, as he learns how to handle the kind of campaign he wants to run. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dealing with essential impossibility
Top