Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dealing with Inter-Party Conflict
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 8095462" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>Nitpick - this is about "intra-" not "inter-" party conflict.</p><p></p><p>It's an unfortunate situation for which there is some blame for everyone - and mostly for the DM. If you're a lawyer questioning a witness you never ask a question you don't already know the answer to. If you're a DM in an RPG you never give players/PC's a choice if you're not prepared to accept it if they do - and that includes the possibility that every player/PC chooses differently than every other one and really throws the game into a tizzy. Individual PC's making a choice for a dark deal which has been offered, a deal that others VEHEMENTLY oppose not just for themselves but as an option for anyone else in the party - that's a landmine planted by the DM.</p><p></p><p>Now I'm also of the opinion that players have an unstated obligation to SEEK ways and means for their characters with wildly differing attitudes and opinions to nonetheless continue to work together. You may not have signed contracts to that end, but that's what the game revolves around. Don't look for all the ways to make any such bump as big of an issue as it possibly can be - looking for ways to MINIMIZE the disruption to the game overall is the mark of the better player. Of course ANY player taking a stand of, "It's my way or the highway for all OTHER players/PC's." needs to be disabused of the notion of the <em>supreme </em>importance of <em>only</em> their personal viewpoint, as well as to be reminded that this is a GAME which doesn't actually include a win/loss column and everyone can just calm the freak down and quit treating actions IN game (which haven't yet even caused <em>hardships</em> yet if I understand correctly) as personal attacks OUT of the game.</p><p></p><p>Best way to proceed is for the DM to step up and say, "I apologize. I messed up. I didn't mean to do it, but I put you all in a position to end up fiercely opposed to each other and that isn't what any of us want or need. So blame ME if you need to get upset with anyone, otherwise let's SORT THIS OUT before <u>you</u> all blow it out of proportion."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 8095462, member: 32740"] Nitpick - this is about "intra-" not "inter-" party conflict. It's an unfortunate situation for which there is some blame for everyone - and mostly for the DM. If you're a lawyer questioning a witness you never ask a question you don't already know the answer to. If you're a DM in an RPG you never give players/PC's a choice if you're not prepared to accept it if they do - and that includes the possibility that every player/PC chooses differently than every other one and really throws the game into a tizzy. Individual PC's making a choice for a dark deal which has been offered, a deal that others VEHEMENTLY oppose not just for themselves but as an option for anyone else in the party - that's a landmine planted by the DM. Now I'm also of the opinion that players have an unstated obligation to SEEK ways and means for their characters with wildly differing attitudes and opinions to nonetheless continue to work together. You may not have signed contracts to that end, but that's what the game revolves around. Don't look for all the ways to make any such bump as big of an issue as it possibly can be - looking for ways to MINIMIZE the disruption to the game overall is the mark of the better player. Of course ANY player taking a stand of, "It's my way or the highway for all OTHER players/PC's." needs to be disabused of the notion of the [I]supreme [/I]importance of [I]only[/I] their personal viewpoint, as well as to be reminded that this is a GAME which doesn't actually include a win/loss column and everyone can just calm the freak down and quit treating actions IN game (which haven't yet even caused [I]hardships[/I] yet if I understand correctly) as personal attacks OUT of the game. Best way to proceed is for the DM to step up and say, "I apologize. I messed up. I didn't mean to do it, but I put you all in a position to end up fiercely opposed to each other and that isn't what any of us want or need. So blame ME if you need to get upset with anyone, otherwise let's SORT THIS OUT before [U]you[/U] all blow it out of proportion." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dealing with Inter-Party Conflict
Top