Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dealing with optimizers at the table
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8224314" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Oh for god's sake. Are you remotely serious?</p><p></p><p>Have other players complained about them? Are the other players looking sad-as-hell during combat? Or is this entirely in your head?</p><p></p><p>Again, I've seen DMs who had an attitude like you seem to be saying. The problem, in those cases, was them. For example, my exact group. Two players don't really optimize, two players are moderate optimizers, two are usually serious-ass optimizers. If I DM, or my brother DMs, or the other experienced DM DMs, or my wife DMs for that matter, there's no problem at all. If one of the players who is also one of the moderate optimizers DMs, he can't handle it, he can't handle that some of us are much more effective than others. We can handle it. We don't care. We've been playing like this for ages. If a character is really weak, yeah a player might want to change it, but it's usually only the optimizers who even notice their PC isn't effective. But that one guy, he's literally ended campaigns because of this.</p><p></p><p>Hence we don't have him DM anymore. But this is DM problem in his case, not a player problem. Unless you're getting actual complaints, or can both see that players are visibly unhappy and have confirmed this by asking them, you're the problem.</p><p></p><p>Alternatively, if you can't accept you are the problem, 5E is the problem. It is inherently, using only the classes, spells, and abilities in the PHB, a game where two DPS characters could very easily end up not just 20% apart on DPR, but 100% apart, if one person takes, say, a Warlock with Agonizing Blast and Hex (as any sane Warlock should!), and keeps using ASIs on their CHA (again, reasonable by your own definition in the original post), and then the other player takes say a Warlock but goes Pact of the Blade, but does NOT pick the Hexblade as his patron, and thus has induced MAD in his build, and maybe he's spread his stats around in a slightly dubious way, and spreads his ASIs around, or buys Feats instead, maybe ones that don't buff his build, and doesn't use Hex, but instead picks other spells, there could easily be a 100% difference in DPR.</p><p></p><p>But you seem to think the guy playing perfectly reasonably but doing 100% more DPR is being unreasonable. He is not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8224314, member: 18"] Oh for god's sake. Are you remotely serious? Have other players complained about them? Are the other players looking sad-as-hell during combat? Or is this entirely in your head? Again, I've seen DMs who had an attitude like you seem to be saying. The problem, in those cases, was them. For example, my exact group. Two players don't really optimize, two players are moderate optimizers, two are usually serious-ass optimizers. If I DM, or my brother DMs, or the other experienced DM DMs, or my wife DMs for that matter, there's no problem at all. If one of the players who is also one of the moderate optimizers DMs, he can't handle it, he can't handle that some of us are much more effective than others. We can handle it. We don't care. We've been playing like this for ages. If a character is really weak, yeah a player might want to change it, but it's usually only the optimizers who even notice their PC isn't effective. But that one guy, he's literally ended campaigns because of this. Hence we don't have him DM anymore. But this is DM problem in his case, not a player problem. Unless you're getting actual complaints, or can both see that players are visibly unhappy and have confirmed this by asking them, you're the problem. Alternatively, if you can't accept you are the problem, 5E is the problem. It is inherently, using only the classes, spells, and abilities in the PHB, a game where two DPS characters could very easily end up not just 20% apart on DPR, but 100% apart, if one person takes, say, a Warlock with Agonizing Blast and Hex (as any sane Warlock should!), and keeps using ASIs on their CHA (again, reasonable by your own definition in the original post), and then the other player takes say a Warlock but goes Pact of the Blade, but does NOT pick the Hexblade as his patron, and thus has induced MAD in his build, and maybe he's spread his stats around in a slightly dubious way, and spreads his ASIs around, or buys Feats instead, maybe ones that don't buff his build, and doesn't use Hex, but instead picks other spells, there could easily be a 100% difference in DPR. But you seem to think the guy playing perfectly reasonably but doing 100% more DPR is being unreasonable. He is not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dealing with optimizers at the table
Top