Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dear Team WotC: Better Pact Magic Fixes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VenerableBede" data-source="post: 9005720" data-attributes="member: 7032917"><p>If your metric to measure "full caster", "full casting", and/or "not losing out on spellcasting" is nova ability and low-level spell slots, then you are entirely correct.</p><p></p><p>If your metric to measure "full caster"/"full casting" is a class's ability to match up with the wizard in raw damage output, then you are entirely correct.</p><p></p><p>Here's my metric: if a class receives spell levels at the same rate as a full caster (we can use the wizard as the standard example) and gets comparable spell slot value as a full caster, that class is a full caster. Here's how the warlock matches up:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Between Pact Magic and Mystic Arcanum, the warlock gains access to spell levels at the same rate as the wizard. Warlock passes this test.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Warlocks only ever get one 8th and 9th level spell per long rest, same as the wizard. Wizard eventually gets two 6th and 7th level spells per long rest, while warlock caps out at one. For me, this still fits the metric of "comparable spell slot value," so the warlock passes this test for 6th–9th level spells, but we can note that the warlock has a little less spell slot value at higher levels.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Warlocks get Pact Magic for 1st–5th level spells, while wizards get traditional spell progression. This is harder to measure for comparable spell slot value, but not impossible. We can use the Spell Points variant rule in the DMG to assign a value to every spell slot of every level and, from there, determine how many points' worth of slots wizards and warlocks get at every level (specifically for spell levels 1–5; we don't need to compare the higher spell levels in this test because we already did in a previous test). I'll share the chart comparing the two below. Here are the results: nine out of 20 levels, warlocks have a higher spell slot value than wizards, and on average across all levels warlocks are 1 spell point above wizards, which isn't even enough spell points to cast a first-level spell. I think that means the warlock passes this test.</li> </ul><p>[ATTACH=full]283138[/ATTACH]</p><p style="text-align: center"><em>Left Chart: Spell Points by Spell Level and Character Level, Traditional Caster, Spell Levels 1–5.</em></p> <p style="text-align: center"><em>Middle Chart: Spell Points by Spell Level and Number of Slots, Pact Magic.</em></p> <p style="text-align: center"><em>Right Chart: Difference in Total Spell Points Per Day by Level, Pact Magic Minus Traditional Magic. (Averaged at the bottom. Assumes two short rests per day for Pact Magic.)</em></p><p></p><p>This is <strong>not</strong> an argument that the warlock does not need <em>eldritch blast</em>, Invocations, Pact Boons, and the rest of the warlock package. Having to take a rest in order to access all of their spell slots does limit warlock nova potential; not being able to break their spell slots up into smaller slots for the purpose of utility does limit warlock versatility; etc. Warlocks having weird casting gives them unique strengths and weaknesses that differ greatly from traditional full casters, both in flavor and in application, and in practice it may be that the warlock approach is weaker (despite still technically being full casting) because it is less flexible, or because it doesn't have as good access to spells, etc. But the math is pretty clear: strictly in terms of the relative value of spell levels and spell slots, warlocks have everything that traditional casters have, just, as Neonchameleon put it earlier, built high rather than wide. That makes them full casters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VenerableBede, post: 9005720, member: 7032917"] If your metric to measure "full caster", "full casting", and/or "not losing out on spellcasting" is nova ability and low-level spell slots, then you are entirely correct. If your metric to measure "full caster"/"full casting" is a class's ability to match up with the wizard in raw damage output, then you are entirely correct. Here's my metric: if a class receives spell levels at the same rate as a full caster (we can use the wizard as the standard example) and gets comparable spell slot value as a full caster, that class is a full caster. Here's how the warlock matches up: [LIST] [*]Between Pact Magic and Mystic Arcanum, the warlock gains access to spell levels at the same rate as the wizard. Warlock passes this test. [*]Warlocks only ever get one 8th and 9th level spell per long rest, same as the wizard. Wizard eventually gets two 6th and 7th level spells per long rest, while warlock caps out at one. For me, this still fits the metric of "comparable spell slot value," so the warlock passes this test for 6th–9th level spells, but we can note that the warlock has a little less spell slot value at higher levels. [*]Warlocks get Pact Magic for 1st–5th level spells, while wizards get traditional spell progression. This is harder to measure for comparable spell slot value, but not impossible. We can use the Spell Points variant rule in the DMG to assign a value to every spell slot of every level and, from there, determine how many points' worth of slots wizards and warlocks get at every level (specifically for spell levels 1–5; we don't need to compare the higher spell levels in this test because we already did in a previous test). I'll share the chart comparing the two below. Here are the results: nine out of 20 levels, warlocks have a higher spell slot value than wizards, and on average across all levels warlocks are 1 spell point above wizards, which isn't even enough spell points to cast a first-level spell. I think that means the warlock passes this test. [/LIST] [ATTACH type="full"]283138[/ATTACH] [CENTER][I]Left Chart: Spell Points by Spell Level and Character Level, Traditional Caster, Spell Levels 1–5. Middle Chart: Spell Points by Spell Level and Number of Slots, Pact Magic. Right Chart: Difference in Total Spell Points Per Day by Level, Pact Magic Minus Traditional Magic. (Averaged at the bottom. Assumes two short rests per day for Pact Magic.)[/I][/CENTER] This is [B]not[/B] an argument that the warlock does not need [I]eldritch blast[/I], Invocations, Pact Boons, and the rest of the warlock package. Having to take a rest in order to access all of their spell slots does limit warlock nova potential; not being able to break their spell slots up into smaller slots for the purpose of utility does limit warlock versatility; etc. Warlocks having weird casting gives them unique strengths and weaknesses that differ greatly from traditional full casters, both in flavor and in application, and in practice it may be that the warlock approach is weaker (despite still technically being full casting) because it is less flexible, or because it doesn't have as good access to spells, etc. But the math is pretty clear: strictly in terms of the relative value of spell levels and spell slots, warlocks have everything that traditional casters have, just, as Neonchameleon put it earlier, built high rather than wide. That makes them full casters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dear Team WotC: Better Pact Magic Fixes
Top