Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9006603" data-attributes="member: 2525">I dispute the solid spellcaster part. You think they're solid because you have said in your games you can get a short rest whenever you need to. In many games that doesn't happen. In many games that means their spellcaster is at best a side issue and at worst those two spell slots are held on to and never used. In no way does that make them a solid spellcasting class. They have other cool things they do but a lot of what many Warlock players are forced to do, because of the existing mechanics of the Warlock, is shoot an eldritch blast in combat and then do something with an invocation. Which is not a solid spellcaster.These changes are attempting to remedy that and make them into a solid spellcaster. But you are against that because in your games you can get lots of spell slots and think anyone who can't isn't playing the game right or has a bad DM or frankly I am at a loss as to why you think your game is the norm and theirs an anomaly despite tons of feedback to WOTC of the opposite. Yes indeed they absolutely can track their slots left on their thumbs, which somehow you described as "solid spellcasting."They have a bunch of one time per day spells though they need to track as they get to higher levels, right?Wizard yes, but I've never seen decision paralysis over a Ranger at that levelore later</blockquote>