Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dear Wizards, I no longer have a clue what you're doing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tyrlaan" data-source="post: 5443199" data-attributes="member: 20998"><p>A few not so random thoughts from this peanut gallery...</p><p></p><p>1) As a customer, I care about being satisfied. I don't care and should not be expected to care about the inner workings of a company. I just want them to give me product and/or service offerings that I want. My point here is I shouldn't have to wait for something like DDXP for me to feel confident about being a WotC customer and I shouldn't have to wait for something like DDXP before I voice my gripes or praises. At this very moment I am a customer and any decision I make to buy a product today will be based on the information I have today. </p><p></p><p>1a)DDXP should be for generating customer hype, not settling minds of distressed customers.</p><p></p><p>2)I feel like there's a helping of hyperbole getting thrown around regarding the death of 4e. Even if 4e as a product dies, what exactly is stopping us from still playing it? I won't be switching game systems just because WotC stops selling 4e material and/or offering their software tools. I've spent YEARS playing TTRPGs without a single line of code to back me up and I see no reason why I couldn't go back to that if I choose. </p><p></p><p>2a)While my point is all the cool toys WotC has provided us are not required to play, I'm not suggesting we shouldn't complain about their implementation. Claiming you won't play without them or that the edition is dead without them seems extreme. Choosing to stop paying to use them, on the other hand, seems totally reasonable. </p><p></p><p>2b)My stance clearly suggests I'll keep playing 4e without WotCs support. That's great for me, but not great for WotC. But I suppose the point is not that WotC will care if you keep playing 4e if they stop supporting it, but they will care if you stop using 4e material if they continue to support it. So while I can say it's no skin off my nose if they abandon 4e, this sentiment should seriously concern WotC because I don't need to be their customer anymore. In short (and to Aegeri's OP), if they can't provide things to me that I want to pay for, they might as well can 4e as far as I'm concerned. I've got what I need to keep playing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tyrlaan, post: 5443199, member: 20998"] A few not so random thoughts from this peanut gallery... 1) As a customer, I care about being satisfied. I don't care and should not be expected to care about the inner workings of a company. I just want them to give me product and/or service offerings that I want. My point here is I shouldn't have to wait for something like DDXP for me to feel confident about being a WotC customer and I shouldn't have to wait for something like DDXP before I voice my gripes or praises. At this very moment I am a customer and any decision I make to buy a product today will be based on the information I have today. 1a)DDXP should be for generating customer hype, not settling minds of distressed customers. 2)I feel like there's a helping of hyperbole getting thrown around regarding the death of 4e. Even if 4e as a product dies, what exactly is stopping us from still playing it? I won't be switching game systems just because WotC stops selling 4e material and/or offering their software tools. I've spent YEARS playing TTRPGs without a single line of code to back me up and I see no reason why I couldn't go back to that if I choose. 2a)While my point is all the cool toys WotC has provided us are not required to play, I'm not suggesting we shouldn't complain about their implementation. Claiming you won't play without them or that the edition is dead without them seems extreme. Choosing to stop paying to use them, on the other hand, seems totally reasonable. 2b)My stance clearly suggests I'll keep playing 4e without WotCs support. That's great for me, but not great for WotC. But I suppose the point is not that WotC will care if you keep playing 4e if they stop supporting it, but they will care if you stop using 4e material if they continue to support it. So while I can say it's no skin off my nose if they abandon 4e, this sentiment should seriously concern WotC because I don't need to be their customer anymore. In short (and to Aegeri's OP), if they can't provide things to me that I want to pay for, they might as well can 4e as far as I'm concerned. I've got what I need to keep playing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dear Wizards, I no longer have a clue what you're doing
Top