Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5490551" data-attributes="member: 61155">Personally, I'm very pleased they have introduced this feature - I am eager to see what people are writing and what their responses are.&nbsp;At the same time, the actual response in this article is really disappointing. Having one poster presenting the common request for more content for undersupported classes, and having them post a relatively unrelated letter to try and justify not doing so - while explaining that what they really want for the magazine are articles that don't present new content, but instead just provides more ways to use the content you have - is not what I want to see. &nbsp;I want more content. We don't need to just have completely random bloat of feats and options, but there is plenty of room for new content in areas where it is lacking, and plenty of room to provide new options that expand the game rather than bloat it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5490551, member: 61155"] Personally, I'm very pleased they have introduced this feature - I am eager to see what people are writing and what their responses are. At the same time, the actual response in this article is really disappointing. Having one poster presenting the common request for more content for undersupported classes, and having them post a relatively unrelated letter to try and justify not doing so - while explaining that what they really want for the magazine are articles that don't present new content, but instead just provides more ways to use the content you have - is not what I want to see. I want more content. We don't need to just have completely random bloat of feats and options, but there is plenty of room for new content in areas where it is lacking, and plenty of room to provide new options that expand the game rather than bloat it. [/QUOTE]

Verification