Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mach1.9pants" data-source="post: 5860952" data-attributes="member: 55946">Whether comparing to Blizzard is relevant or not is... irelevant <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />The idea is that, and I agree, they polish/TEST! 5E more than 4E. I missed 3E and went straight into 3.5 so maybe it is relevant to 3E as well. But I know the absolute crap maths that came in parts of 4E (e.g. skill challenges) really left a sour taste in the mouth. Especially as they were picked up within days of release by the customers. I certainly like the previous idea of releasing the game digitally for a while before the books. Smaller companies are doing it (honour and intrigue for ex) but I don't see WotC doing it, sadly.EDIT: The idea of a DDi which you can easily submit feedback on errors is a great one. The only problem, and it is HUGE, is sorting the wheat from the chaff. If you read errata threads for games it seems many people are totally incapable of sorting real errors/balance issues from their preferences. I see heaps of it in PC games threads and TTRPG seem to be just as bad! The person who had to compile that stuff would go mad from nerd rage <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification