Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 3919412" data-attributes="member: 40961">I understand your position.I, personally, prefer a breadth of classes to having one polymath class that covers tons of territory.&nbsp; So for me, having wizards lose some of their &quot;we can do anything&quot; nature, and giving some of their abilities to other classes to make them more viable and to give them more of a niche, is a positive thing.I can understand why someone who likes the &quot;wizards as polymaths&quot; archetype would disagree.I don't know what else to say about that.&nbsp; I'm happy with the change, but I'm sorry you are not.&nbsp; The best I can suggest is to give this style of play a try- instead of having a campaign world inhabited by &quot;wizards who mostly choose to use enchantment spells,&quot; and &quot;wizards who mostly choose to use evocation spells,&quot; and &quot;wizards who mostly choose to use curses,&quot; it can be a world of Psions, Wizards, and Warlocks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 3919412, member: 40961"] I understand your position. I, personally, prefer a breadth of classes to having one polymath class that covers tons of territory. So for me, having wizards lose some of their "we can do anything" nature, and giving some of their abilities to other classes to make them more viable and to give them more of a niche, is a positive thing. I can understand why someone who likes the "wizards as polymaths" archetype would disagree. I don't know what else to say about that. I'm happy with the change, but I'm sorry you are not. The best I can suggest is to give this style of play a try- instead of having a campaign world inhabited by "wizards who mostly choose to use enchantment spells," and "wizards who mostly choose to use evocation spells," and "wizards who mostly choose to use curses," it can be a world of Psions, Wizards, and Warlocks. [/QUOTE]

Verification