Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Death of the LGS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mlund" data-source="post: 4349583" data-attributes="member: 50304"><p>Sorry, but you're just inviting more corrections to misstatements about economics when you make politically biased statements like this:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is factually incorrect. You can only even remotely posit this statement being true is when you redefine the academic and literal meaning of "recession" into politically biased Newspeak. The NBER is pretty much the academic authority on this sort of thing. We are not in the midst of a recession that started in 2000, regardless of how politically advantageous such a counter-factual narrative might be to some parties.</p><p></p><p>"Recession," is not interchangeable with "I'm not happy about the way the economy is playing out."</p><p></p><p>Considering the distinction between political attitudes towards capitalism vs. scientific theories of economics, I'd say that's factually and historically incorrect. More accurately, there are two major schools of <strong>political</strong> thought as it relates to capitalism, labeled (often times mistakenly so) as "liberal" and "conservative" in the United States (once you get out of the U.S. those words have a different meaning in some areas).</p><p></p><p>Nevermind the fact that "economic Liberalism" and "political policies of so-called 'liberals' as they pertain to economic policy" are ridiculously at odds with one another.</p><p></p><p>Most of the controversial economic theories going around are <strong>socio-political</strong> theories about how to <strong>influence</strong> markets, rather than the more grounded scientific fundamentals of economics. Just because everyone and their dog has an "economic theory" doesn't mean those theories are equally valid as say - fundamentals of supply and demand, price points, and elasticity.</p><p></p><p>Sticking to the practical and statistical science of economics rather than the politically charged rhetoric addressing the merits and flaws of capitalism would probably be best. </p><p></p><p>- Marty Lund</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mlund, post: 4349583, member: 50304"] Sorry, but you're just inviting more corrections to misstatements about economics when you make politically biased statements like this: This is factually incorrect. You can only even remotely posit this statement being true is when you redefine the academic and literal meaning of "recession" into politically biased Newspeak. The NBER is pretty much the academic authority on this sort of thing. We are not in the midst of a recession that started in 2000, regardless of how politically advantageous such a counter-factual narrative might be to some parties. "Recession," is not interchangeable with "I'm not happy about the way the economy is playing out." Considering the distinction between political attitudes towards capitalism vs. scientific theories of economics, I'd say that's factually and historically incorrect. More accurately, there are two major schools of [B]political[/B] thought as it relates to capitalism, labeled (often times mistakenly so) as "liberal" and "conservative" in the United States (once you get out of the U.S. those words have a different meaning in some areas). Nevermind the fact that "economic Liberalism" and "political policies of so-called 'liberals' as they pertain to economic policy" are ridiculously at odds with one another. Most of the controversial economic theories going around are [B]socio-political[/B] theories about how to [B]influence[/B] markets, rather than the more grounded scientific fundamentals of economics. Just because everyone and their dog has an "economic theory" doesn't mean those theories are equally valid as say - fundamentals of supply and demand, price points, and elasticity. Sticking to the practical and statistical science of economics rather than the politically charged rhetoric addressing the merits and flaws of capitalism would probably be best. - Marty Lund [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Death of the LGS
Top