Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Death Penalties
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tom Strickland" data-source="post: 6228032" data-attributes="member: 6753119"><p>If almost nobody in any group abuses death penalties (to hear it told), let alone finds occasion to use them in the first place, I say: Let them stand! (Nevertheless, 'house rules' will always tweak or dispense with altogether the disliked bits according to group tastes.)</p><p></p><p>Two thoughts:</p><p></p><p>1. Numerous "older" fantasy, swords & sorcery, and other genres included gritty tales of wonder and woe that proposed certain experiences whose depictions may have fallen from favor over time. The prototypical experience of weakened heroes in the aftermath of tangling with horrifying undead, or else being imperfect in the aftermath of being raised (like a Frankenstein's monster perhaps) spoke to the results of supernatural injuries or recoveries after having died. If the consequences are "just" variations on a theme of inconvenient encounter results, there is something perhaps unique lost from the full palette. This is where discussions of art and science in other threads shed light on gaming aspects: in this case, the mechanic captures an experiential process which quite reasonably results in character angst at the implications.</p><p></p><p>2. Leading to: There is a school of thought which states that excellence is developed by experience (over time). As contrasting examples: some universities have a pass/fail only (or even no grade at all) measurement system, whereas others have some accredited grading scheme. I subscribe to the theory that including some challenges with terrible consequences in the full spectrum of possibilities is beneficial to players and their characters. It is a type of mechanic which ought to be specified regardless of whether it is actually used. The rules designers could even specify 2+ levels of consequences and implications in the game for DM's and players to choose.</p><p></p><p>I am glad the challenges I have faced and even run afoul of included the potential for serious consequences. The tactical side puts a weighted value on certain actions, goals, places to visit, spells and items to select, etc. The role-playing side enjoys a verisimilitude in that--even though it is fantasy--it is similar enough to familiar concepts of life and death, risk and reward, failure and consequence, that the struggles to return can become as sagas because of the difficulties (as when Cugel is flown away to a distant land, a king is banished from his throne, a party lands in Limbo due to a misfired spell, and so on). [Or perhaps more pertinently, when Jack in Jack of Shadows by Roger Zelazny must fight his way from the dung heap where dark-siders are reincarnated, past soul-sucking dangers though wastelands patrolled by enemy forces.]</p><p></p><p>There is an entire sub-system of effects, abilities (by certain undead or extra-planar creatures), magic, and consequences which are bypassed without the more-serious-than-other-effects of death: requires break enchantment; requires dispel magic; cannot be raised; cannot be resurrected; is lost forever... The Sphere of Annihilation. Stormbringer?! </p><p></p><p>I personally want integrated mechanics which handle certain fictional narratives. I fully respect when others do not want the same mechanics. But I appreciate when game designers in their element and according to their fortes build in something--especially with official or suggested variants--so it need not be extensively home-brewed.</p><p></p><p><strong>Disclaimers</strong>: Also, even prior to reading the recent posts and adding an additional comment, I thought of mentioning that I have raise dead magics set at easily a 10x multiple--it is a big deal to choose to do that. And people do sell and borrow to bring back a treasured character. Players in my campaigns do not "burn through PC's" at all. They have bristled in the past at the penalties, but have become better tacticians by using increasingly effective choices and timings of abilities, actions, situational awareness, manipulation of opponent motivations and weaknesses, etc. And then there is "True Resurrection"!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tom Strickland, post: 6228032, member: 6753119"] If almost nobody in any group abuses death penalties (to hear it told), let alone finds occasion to use them in the first place, I say: Let them stand! (Nevertheless, 'house rules' will always tweak or dispense with altogether the disliked bits according to group tastes.) Two thoughts: 1. Numerous "older" fantasy, swords & sorcery, and other genres included gritty tales of wonder and woe that proposed certain experiences whose depictions may have fallen from favor over time. The prototypical experience of weakened heroes in the aftermath of tangling with horrifying undead, or else being imperfect in the aftermath of being raised (like a Frankenstein's monster perhaps) spoke to the results of supernatural injuries or recoveries after having died. If the consequences are "just" variations on a theme of inconvenient encounter results, there is something perhaps unique lost from the full palette. This is where discussions of art and science in other threads shed light on gaming aspects: in this case, the mechanic captures an experiential process which quite reasonably results in character angst at the implications. 2. Leading to: There is a school of thought which states that excellence is developed by experience (over time). As contrasting examples: some universities have a pass/fail only (or even no grade at all) measurement system, whereas others have some accredited grading scheme. I subscribe to the theory that including some challenges with terrible consequences in the full spectrum of possibilities is beneficial to players and their characters. It is a type of mechanic which ought to be specified regardless of whether it is actually used. The rules designers could even specify 2+ levels of consequences and implications in the game for DM's and players to choose. I am glad the challenges I have faced and even run afoul of included the potential for serious consequences. The tactical side puts a weighted value on certain actions, goals, places to visit, spells and items to select, etc. The role-playing side enjoys a verisimilitude in that--even though it is fantasy--it is similar enough to familiar concepts of life and death, risk and reward, failure and consequence, that the struggles to return can become as sagas because of the difficulties (as when Cugel is flown away to a distant land, a king is banished from his throne, a party lands in Limbo due to a misfired spell, and so on). [Or perhaps more pertinently, when Jack in Jack of Shadows by Roger Zelazny must fight his way from the dung heap where dark-siders are reincarnated, past soul-sucking dangers though wastelands patrolled by enemy forces.] There is an entire sub-system of effects, abilities (by certain undead or extra-planar creatures), magic, and consequences which are bypassed without the more-serious-than-other-effects of death: requires break enchantment; requires dispel magic; cannot be raised; cannot be resurrected; is lost forever... The Sphere of Annihilation. Stormbringer?! I personally want integrated mechanics which handle certain fictional narratives. I fully respect when others do not want the same mechanics. But I appreciate when game designers in their element and according to their fortes build in something--especially with official or suggested variants--so it need not be extensively home-brewed. [B]Disclaimers[/B]: Also, even prior to reading the recent posts and adding an additional comment, I thought of mentioning that I have raise dead magics set at easily a 10x multiple--it is a big deal to choose to do that. And people do sell and borrow to bring back a treasured character. Players in my campaigns do not "burn through PC's" at all. They have bristled in the past at the penalties, but have become better tacticians by using increasingly effective choices and timings of abilities, actions, situational awareness, manipulation of opponent motivations and weaknesses, etc. And then there is "True Resurrection"! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Death Penalties
Top