Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8603951" data-attributes="member: 7032025">And therefore, all the other people present, who are not idiots and are generally aware of danger where watching him particularly, so that when he started to raise his hand, the fighter 30 feat away jumped at him so quickly and suddenly, drawing his sword, that he hesitated until he was struck and killed, that's what you deserve for thinking yourself clever and sneaky. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />After that, it's only, once more, your personal preferences and you telling other DMs that they are idiots for not saying how absurd a situation is. Stop it.And me who was thinking naively that, in discussions of RAW, you ignore the rule 0 of &quot;rulings over rules&quot;, otherwise it's pointless to discuss the rules which were actually written, as they can always be superseded. I'm pretty sure you wrote something of the kind to me about this in the past, but I'm too lazy to check. Anyway, good luck trying to explain to anyone that this is how you read the RAW with the reasoning above...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8603951, member: 7032025"] And therefore, all the other people present, who are not idiots and are generally aware of danger where watching him particularly, so that when he started to raise his hand, the fighter 30 feat away jumped at him so quickly and suddenly, drawing his sword, that he hesitated until he was struck and killed, that's what you deserve for thinking yourself clever and sneaky. :p After that, it's only, once more, your personal preferences and you telling other DMs that they are idiots for not saying how absurd a situation is. Stop it. And me who was thinking naively that, in discussions of RAW, you ignore the rule 0 of "rulings over rules", otherwise it's pointless to discuss the rules which were actually written, as they can always be superseded. I'm pretty sure you wrote something of the kind to me about this in the past, but I'm too lazy to check. Anyway, good luck trying to explain to anyone that this is how you read the RAW with the reasoning above... [/QUOTE]

Verification