Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="eyebeams" data-source="post: 2745094" data-attributes="member: 9225">Well no. That'd be you. If you want to frame the state that exists between the industry leaders as one of straightforward competition, then (with some caveats I've noticed), you must accept an absurd definition.Products are generally considered to compete if they fulfil the same desire. You can define this broadly, in which case the desire for amsuement includes a number of things, or tightly. By and large, competition to fulfil the "desire to play RPGs" is largely illusory. People want to play particular games, WotC market research shows that they play these games non-exclusively. Strictly speaking, the numbers may well indicate that competition between RPGs and other media is *more* relevant than competition between RPGs.Nah, I explained it above just fine. It speaks to relevance. I would encourage you to rebut what I write, instead of what you choose to edit it down to, man, but I'm not the boss of you!Well, you sure showed me, chief!</blockquote>