Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Decline of RPG sales
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GVDammerung" data-source="post: 2755880" data-attributes="member: 33060"><p>I am a Greyhawk fan. I have had a single exchange of posts with Charles on the topic on the Wotc message boards, which I let drop after he made his position clear - no Greyhawk.</p><p></p><p>"Bleating on?" Hardly.</p><p></p><p>My liking of Greyhawk does not speak to that which is derivative, predictable or duplicative as it is, very clearly, my personal preference, not business advice. While I do not believe Wotc would be harmed by supporting multiple settings, including Greyhawk, if done properly, if asked, such would _not_ be my business advice.</p><p></p><p>My business advice, vis-a-vis published settings, would be to look for the next "omni-setting" that would replace the long in the tooth and overgrown with detail Forgotten Realms, which is not ideally new gamer friendly in its massive detail and learning curve. Eberron is a niche setting and cannot replace the Forgotten Realms, IMO. The Forgotten Realms themselves are perfectly positioned to remain a strong income producer in the vein of Dragonlance - through novels. However, the Realms should not, IMO, be seen as the future of D&D or of Wotc. </p><p></p><p>That Wotc clings to the Realms and can find nothing with which to match the Realm's model of success, now that the Realms increasingly labors under its own accumulated weight of material, is what is duplicative. </p><p></p><p>I forget how many iterations of the Realms there have been, how many treatments of Waterdeep etc. This is what is derivative.</p><p></p><p>What is predictable is your championing of Wotc at every turn and your attempt to nay-say anything not fully lauditory of Wotc. They say "the road to hell is paved with good intentions." Your "good intentions" toward Wotc, if widely adopted, will lead just there through noncritical, "at-a-boy" thinking. Innovate or stagnate.</p><p></p><p>The Wotc information you can obtain and then present here through your tireless efforts to ingratiate yourself with Wotc through your constant championing of their cause and defense of their "virture" is most appreciated. I simply find your means to that end otherwise.</p><p></p><p>Btw, does Wotc pay you for your work on all these message boards on their behalf? They really should. Maybe they could give you some design work as a "reward?" Designing the next Forgotten Realms iteration? That would be perfect.</p><p></p><p>"Cheers."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GVDammerung, post: 2755880, member: 33060"] I am a Greyhawk fan. I have had a single exchange of posts with Charles on the topic on the Wotc message boards, which I let drop after he made his position clear - no Greyhawk. "Bleating on?" Hardly. My liking of Greyhawk does not speak to that which is derivative, predictable or duplicative as it is, very clearly, my personal preference, not business advice. While I do not believe Wotc would be harmed by supporting multiple settings, including Greyhawk, if done properly, if asked, such would _not_ be my business advice. My business advice, vis-a-vis published settings, would be to look for the next "omni-setting" that would replace the long in the tooth and overgrown with detail Forgotten Realms, which is not ideally new gamer friendly in its massive detail and learning curve. Eberron is a niche setting and cannot replace the Forgotten Realms, IMO. The Forgotten Realms themselves are perfectly positioned to remain a strong income producer in the vein of Dragonlance - through novels. However, the Realms should not, IMO, be seen as the future of D&D or of Wotc. That Wotc clings to the Realms and can find nothing with which to match the Realm's model of success, now that the Realms increasingly labors under its own accumulated weight of material, is what is duplicative. I forget how many iterations of the Realms there have been, how many treatments of Waterdeep etc. This is what is derivative. What is predictable is your championing of Wotc at every turn and your attempt to nay-say anything not fully lauditory of Wotc. They say "the road to hell is paved with good intentions." Your "good intentions" toward Wotc, if widely adopted, will lead just there through noncritical, "at-a-boy" thinking. Innovate or stagnate. The Wotc information you can obtain and then present here through your tireless efforts to ingratiate yourself with Wotc through your constant championing of their cause and defense of their "virture" is most appreciated. I simply find your means to that end otherwise. Btw, does Wotc pay you for your work on all these message boards on their behalf? They really should. Maybe they could give you some design work as a "reward?" Designing the next Forgotten Realms iteration? That would be perfect. "Cheers." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Decline of RPG sales
Top