Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Emoshin" data-source="post: 8937784" data-attributes="member: 7040377">I hear what you are saying, and regardless of the merits of the AI-generated content, I appreciate a few things about it:- It keeps reflecting back &quot;While it's true that...&quot;. To me, it seems like a form of reflecting or validating or receiving that would be an emotionally intelligent thing to do when arguing. I don't know if this was hard-wired into the model or self-learned. Either way, the idea tickles me that the AI doesn't know why it's doing it, but it does it and humans are supposed to know to do these things, but rarely do.- Nobody can prove what the future will hold, and our predictions are as good as the inputs we take in. The AI does provide counter-scenarios (like debiasing) that are worth exploring. Considering a large part of the corporate and scientific world is attempting to improve AI, it seems to be fallacious or problematic to stake a side and not information-gather the other side in order to achieve the most accurate prediction, should one choose to do so. That makes the AI a useful tool to get initial info on things that we know we don't know, for further scoping &amp; investigation.- All in all, there are important things I think we can learn from AI (and vice versa of course) such as having tools to improve humility and intellectual honesty, reduce human biases, etc.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Emoshin, post: 8937784, member: 7040377"] I hear what you are saying, and regardless of the merits of the AI-generated content, I appreciate a few things about it: - It keeps reflecting back "While it's true that...". To me, it seems like a form of reflecting or validating or receiving that would be an emotionally intelligent thing to do when arguing. I don't know if this was hard-wired into the model or self-learned. Either way, the idea tickles me that the AI doesn't know why it's doing it, but it does it and humans are supposed to know to do these things, but rarely do. - Nobody can prove what the future will hold, and our predictions are as good as the inputs we take in. The AI does provide counter-scenarios (like debiasing) that are worth exploring. Considering a large part of the corporate and scientific world is attempting to improve AI, it seems to be fallacious or problematic to stake a side and not information-gather the other side in order to achieve the most accurate prediction, should one choose to do so. That makes the AI a useful tool to get initial info on things that we know we don't know, for further scoping & investigation. - All in all, there are important things I think we can learn from AI (and vice versa of course) such as having tools to improve humility and intellectual honesty, reduce human biases, etc. [/QUOTE]

Verification