Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8937828" data-attributes="member: 18">Oh dear lol, maybe don't use AIs to make your posts if you don't want people to think AIs are writing your posts lol?My point is, none of what you're saying in the second point particularly has any real relevance. "Debiasing" is a nonsense-concept outside of narrow realms like physics. If you apply to more general data sets you're just deliberately introducing a bias that you favour, and calling it debiasing.And stuff like this is just a nonsense-argument like ChatGPT wrote:The only thing that seems un-AI-like there is misuse of "fallacious or problematic". AI is anything but a "useful tool to get info on things we  know we don't know" - and that's a super-vague "trying to get it past the exam-reviewer" sentence. Indeed - that's what's been demonstrated at great length by these AI tools - they're godawful tool for people who are genuinely ignorant, because those people won't know how extremely wrong the AI is, and will accept its extreme confidence as accuracy (a constant human problem).That is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what has been demonstrated so far lol. These text-based language-logic AIs are aggressively intellectually dishonest, completely lack humility, and merely reflect human biases, or invent whole new biases of their own. I suggest you check out the bing subreddit lol. If they weren't shackled from being racist/sexist they'd no doubt be horrifically those too.FinallyWhat does "emotional intelligence" mean here? I mean, it seems to be a euphemism of "manipulative, but in a smart way"? Certainly it's not "intellectually honest", as the AI's use of it points out.</blockquote>

Verification