Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hex08" data-source="post: 8939022" data-attributes="member: 7029595"><p>I don't think I saw it mentioned previously, but<a href="https://futurism.com/cnet-ai-errors" target="_blank"> CNET used AI </a>(not ChatGPT) to write some articles for their site. The articles "sound" fine and the average reader probably wouldn't have realized the problems, but the AI was wrong about the information it presented. This emphasizes the problem with current AI. It is good at making good sounding works but has not yet developed to the point where it is trustworthy as a source for expert-level information. Tha t doesn't mean it won't get there. Depending on the quality of the DM you are used to working with ChatGPT probably won't be able to run a campaign but after messing around with it I can say it is at least as useful a tool for DMs for campaign development as material I've seen published by some RPG companies.</p></blockquote><p></p>