Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 382434" data-attributes="member: 2829">Here's the main problem with your argument Taren (one I didn't notice before, which also makes what I stated previously a moot point), in regards to Warning weapons. The description of warning states "the wielder". When you wield a weapon, not only is it "in hand", but you threaten an area. If it's not in hand, you don't threaten an area. If the weapon is stored in the glove, it's not in hand, thus you are not wielding it.See where I'm going with this?I've also seen the argument that the weapon doesn't actually need to be in hand (which I don't agree with), but if that argument is used, then whether or not it's in the glove is a moot point as well, because ultimately, the weapon is still in your possession.What do you think?</blockquote>