Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dross" data-source="post: 2456991" data-attributes="member: 33802">Well, with regard to multiple GMW the enhancement bonus is not the sword's, it's a spell that provides the better enhancement value at least to my way of thinking. VorpalStare,&nbsp; would ou allow the GMW to be cast on a +2 weapon making it +5 attack and damage and +2 for AC? That would seem plausable given what you have said.i will not asked people individuall about what they said but ask questions in general.The SRD doesn't state that the&nbsp; enhancement&nbsp; moved is the magical enchancement bonus only (although that could be reading too much into it) but the implied total enhancememnt bonus. So in this case does the source of the bonus override the type of bonus?Are there other instances where source of the bonus overrides the bonus type? it has been stated that the MW property still works in an anti-magic field, but that's because the magic has been suppressed, not the enhancement bonus of the weapon. using this as an example, doesn't that at least imply that the MW enhancement goes with the magical enhancement to AC (+2), but does not stack for an additional +1 to AC (+3)PrinceZane, i'm confused (again/still <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" />) does that mean that you think the +1 MW goes with the +2 magical enhancement to AC or not?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dross, post: 2456991, member: 33802"] Well, with regard to multiple GMW the enhancement bonus is not the sword's, it's a spell that provides the better enhancement value at least to my way of thinking. VorpalStare, would ou allow the GMW to be cast on a +2 weapon making it +5 attack and damage and +2 for AC? That would seem plausable given what you have said. i will not asked people individuall about what they said but ask questions in general. The SRD doesn't state that the enhancement moved is the [i][b]magical[/b][/i] enchancement bonus only (although that could be reading too much into it) but the implied [i][b]total[/b][/i] enhancememnt bonus. So in this case does the [b]source[/b] of the bonus override the [b]type[/b] of bonus? Are there other instances where source of the bonus overrides the bonus type? it has been stated that the MW property still works in an anti-magic field, but that's because the [b]magic[/b] has been suppressed, not the [b]enhancement bonus[/b] of the weapon. using this as an example, doesn't that at least imply that the MW enhancement goes with the magical enhancement to AC (+2), but does not stack for an additional +1 to AC (+3) PrinceZane, i'm confused (again/still :confused:) does that mean that you think the +1 MW goes with the +2 magical enhancement to AC or not? [/QUOTE]

Verification