Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 2545652" data-attributes="member: 29112"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Nah, not in the slightest. Probably just my not so humble opinion, as usual.In fact, I was responding more to ElectricDragon's post than yours, so that was my mistake. Please just ignore it entirely if you prefer - it won't faze me.Defense Bonus is not written into the basic ruleset, at all. That's what I'm trying to get across here. And Hit Points? Well... suffice to say, the closer you look at them (in the RAW) the greater the number and severity of cracks that show.edit --- and I'd forgotten about my other post prior to this one on this thread. :\ I think that qualifies for a 'whoops' or something like it. IOW, wow has that argument been thrashed out (and not just in this thread, either). And I'd simply forgotten. Harumph. Remind me not to get into one of these again! Otherwise I'll probably just go over the same ground, and others will go over theirs. *yawn*s all round, I suspect.</blockquote>