Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Defenses and To Hits for Your Party ~ Averages
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5412805" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Why does the fighter (with already good stats) not need the feat? Because he already hits enemies on a 10+? Wouldn't it be even better to hit enemies on a 8+?</p><p> </p><p>That's what I don't understand, here. Once again - let's say we've got a dwarf fighter. Lower Str, lower proficiency weapon. He hits enemies on a 12+. We've got another fighter with better stats on hits enemies on a 10+. You seem to feel the dwarf fighter needs the boost from Expertise to stay viable - that the difference of +2 to hit really matters between them. </p><p> </p><p>So why doesn't it matter just as much for the other fighter? Why isn't it just as much an improvement to hit on an 8+ instead of a 10+? What other feats could possibly be more important than +2 to hit? </p><p> </p><p>Now, at Heroic levels the bonus is only +1, of course, and I agree that other choices may be more important. But by the time it reaches an unconditional +2 to hit, Expertise has been better than everything else out there. </p><p> </p><p>And I simply can't understand any viewpoint that can insist it is useful for bringing lower accuracy characters 'in-line' with more optimized characters.. while ignoring the fact that optimized characters will take it as well, and the same difference between the two will remain. And, more importantly, other non-optimized characters <em>won't </em>take it, and the difference between them and optimized characters will only grow larger. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>What do you mean by "hitting generally isn't an issue"? Keep in mind that most abilities used by all classes rely on hitting to really work - automatic effects are usually the domain of daily powers, and non-attack powers are few and far between. So, yeah, hitting is pretty important. </p><p> </p><p>Do you mean that people already hit just fine? That seems to be your indication... but I'm guessing your party doesn't hit all enemies on a 2+. In which case, yeah, they still will be missing on attacks. Increasing accuracy by 2-3 points is going to be a really big deal, regardless of class and role. Now, are other elements (durability, defense, damage, etc) also important? Sure. But rarely will you find a single feat that offers enough in those other areas to compare to what expertise offers for accuracy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5412805, member: 61155"] Why does the fighter (with already good stats) not need the feat? Because he already hits enemies on a 10+? Wouldn't it be even better to hit enemies on a 8+? That's what I don't understand, here. Once again - let's say we've got a dwarf fighter. Lower Str, lower proficiency weapon. He hits enemies on a 12+. We've got another fighter with better stats on hits enemies on a 10+. You seem to feel the dwarf fighter needs the boost from Expertise to stay viable - that the difference of +2 to hit really matters between them. So why doesn't it matter just as much for the other fighter? Why isn't it just as much an improvement to hit on an 8+ instead of a 10+? What other feats could possibly be more important than +2 to hit? Now, at Heroic levels the bonus is only +1, of course, and I agree that other choices may be more important. But by the time it reaches an unconditional +2 to hit, Expertise has been better than everything else out there. And I simply can't understand any viewpoint that can insist it is useful for bringing lower accuracy characters 'in-line' with more optimized characters.. while ignoring the fact that optimized characters will take it as well, and the same difference between the two will remain. And, more importantly, other non-optimized characters [I]won't [/I]take it, and the difference between them and optimized characters will only grow larger. What do you mean by "hitting generally isn't an issue"? Keep in mind that most abilities used by all classes rely on hitting to really work - automatic effects are usually the domain of daily powers, and non-attack powers are few and far between. So, yeah, hitting is pretty important. Do you mean that people already hit just fine? That seems to be your indication... but I'm guessing your party doesn't hit all enemies on a 2+. In which case, yeah, they still will be missing on attacks. Increasing accuracy by 2-3 points is going to be a really big deal, regardless of class and role. Now, are other elements (durability, defense, damage, etc) also important? Sure. But rarely will you find a single feat that offers enough in those other areas to compare to what expertise offers for accuracy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Defenses and To Hits for Your Party ~ Averages
Top