Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8043689" data-attributes="member: 6704184">The most powerful serious proposal thus far still doesn't make the rapier build with optimized feats more powerful than a greatsword build with optimized feats, even at high level. (where -5 to attack means less than it did at low level, so both become more powerful as you level)It's more powerful than low powered feats, which is fine. I'm never gonna build things to be intentionally at the lowest end of power present in the rule books. Giving a rapier rogue build a reliable reaction attack is already part of Sentinel, and depending on game style Mage Slayer, and the reaction attack here relies on an attack missing and not having had to use your reaction yet to use Uncanny Dodge. Every other class that could take this feat doesn't have Sneak Attack, and doesn't get nearly as much out of a single extra attack, but will still want to give this feat some consideration. That's good. As for the first paragraph, I simply disagree. It's threadcrapping, especially in the form I responded to before.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8043689, member: 6704184"] The most powerful serious proposal thus far still doesn't make the rapier build with optimized feats more powerful than a greatsword build with optimized feats, even at high level. (where -5 to attack means less than it did at low level, so both become more powerful as you level) It's more powerful than low powered feats, which is fine. I'm never gonna build things to be intentionally at the lowest end of power present in the rule books. Giving a rapier rogue build a reliable reaction attack is already part of Sentinel, and depending on game style Mage Slayer, and the reaction attack here relies on an attack missing and not having had to use your reaction yet to use Uncanny Dodge. Every other class that could take this feat doesn't have Sneak Attack, and doesn't get nearly as much out of a single extra attack, but will still want to give this feat some consideration. That's good. As for the first paragraph, I simply disagree. It's threadcrapping, especially in the form I responded to before. [/QUOTE]

Verification