Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Define Core Only for your game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HeapThaumaturgist" data-source="post: 3089577" data-attributes="member: 12332"><p>For me, Core Only means that the players are using only the PHB for character creation. I usually ask if people want PrCs in or out, and I've played with PrCs "out", for simplicity.</p><p></p><p>Now-days I would say Core Only also includes, say, DMG PrCs and applicable feats from the MM, but not Level Adjusted Races and the like. No sub-races, either (of which the elves are broken and the others usually just dumb).</p><p></p><p>I did this because I ran alot of college games where we drew players from a large pool of Folks I Don't Know. After the first game (seriously) I picked up two really good players that generally stayed with my various games through the rest of the time I was there, but you never knew who'd ask to join.</p><p></p><p>Why'd I do that because I didn't know the people? I knew the pool. Other folks were running games and I'd hear horror stories about the guy that wanted to play the Vow Of Poverty Feral Anthro-Bahleen Whale Monk or vampires or the guy that carried his Oriental Adventures book everywhere and wanted to play characters from it. Generally players who figured they could outsmart the game and the GM and "win" or whatnot ... usually they were outsmarting themselves more than anything, but explaining the rules to some guy intent on playing a mish-mash rule-breaking character isn't on my list of Things I Want To Do This Session. By stripping things down, people actually played the friggin' game ... some of those guys with the bizzare characters had never played a single-class core-race character, and found the game much more enjoyable for not being buttheads. Othertimes it just weeded out the buttheads.</p><p></p><p>And I think the game can be perfectly fun, interesting, and fulfilling without additional splatbooks. If I didn't, I'd probably not have bought it.</p><p></p><p>If playing with, say, my current group ... I'd be generally cool with them playing whatever they wanted to play, since I'd trust them not to be trying to be buttheads but have a keen concept they want to play. </p><p></p><p>I've had people who balked. Usually they came around to my way of thinking soon enough, or decided not to play. The guy who decides he'd rather not play a game because he can't have some obscure race/class/feat is probably the guy I was going to have "issues" with at the table anyway. It never made the game less-than-fun to play core.</p><p></p><p>--fje</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HeapThaumaturgist, post: 3089577, member: 12332"] For me, Core Only means that the players are using only the PHB for character creation. I usually ask if people want PrCs in or out, and I've played with PrCs "out", for simplicity. Now-days I would say Core Only also includes, say, DMG PrCs and applicable feats from the MM, but not Level Adjusted Races and the like. No sub-races, either (of which the elves are broken and the others usually just dumb). I did this because I ran alot of college games where we drew players from a large pool of Folks I Don't Know. After the first game (seriously) I picked up two really good players that generally stayed with my various games through the rest of the time I was there, but you never knew who'd ask to join. Why'd I do that because I didn't know the people? I knew the pool. Other folks were running games and I'd hear horror stories about the guy that wanted to play the Vow Of Poverty Feral Anthro-Bahleen Whale Monk or vampires or the guy that carried his Oriental Adventures book everywhere and wanted to play characters from it. Generally players who figured they could outsmart the game and the GM and "win" or whatnot ... usually they were outsmarting themselves more than anything, but explaining the rules to some guy intent on playing a mish-mash rule-breaking character isn't on my list of Things I Want To Do This Session. By stripping things down, people actually played the friggin' game ... some of those guys with the bizzare characters had never played a single-class core-race character, and found the game much more enjoyable for not being buttheads. Othertimes it just weeded out the buttheads. And I think the game can be perfectly fun, interesting, and fulfilling without additional splatbooks. If I didn't, I'd probably not have bought it. If playing with, say, my current group ... I'd be generally cool with them playing whatever they wanted to play, since I'd trust them not to be trying to be buttheads but have a keen concept they want to play. I've had people who balked. Usually they came around to my way of thinking soon enough, or decided not to play. The guy who decides he'd rather not play a game because he can't have some obscure race/class/feat is probably the guy I was going to have "issues" with at the table anyway. It never made the game less-than-fun to play core. --fje [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Define Core Only for your game
Top