Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bullgrit" data-source="post: 5245796" data-attributes="member: 31216">As I make this post, it's less than half -- 48.86%. Heck, the &quot;old school&quot; poll got a couple answers over 50% and 60%. So, according to my own poll, my statement seems more accurate than not.What are the pejorative definitions? I could see an argument for the last in the list, but what other one do you consider pejorative?And &quot;including yours, of course&quot;? &quot;Of course&quot;? Look, it's pretty obvious by now, that you have some kind of personal hang up over me. The only time you ever respond to one of my posts is to suggest that I'm in some way biased against a subject.Somewhere along the line of this forum, you got the idea that we hold opposing views on everything D&amp;D. I don't know how you got that idea, as I find most comments you make about D&amp;D in line with my own thoughts, feelings, experiences, and preferences. I've even given xp to some of your posts.I don't know, maybe you've decided to play a role around here as &quot;Bullgrit's constant opposition.&quot; It's just weird for you to be in that role when we actually have a lot of the same feelings about the subject we discuss around here. I seem to have more actual play experiences in common with you than I do with some folks who have never stated disagreement with anything I've ever posted. You have a problem with how I define grognard? You think my definition is negative? Well, I've never called you, (or anyone that I can remember), a grognard. You call yourself a grognard? Well, realize that less than 22% of the people here define it the way you want it. Even removing my &quot;of course&quot; vote, the &quot;confrontational and rejecting&quot; opinion outnumbers the &quot;accepting and embracing&quot; opinion by 23-3. My lone opinion on the definition doesn't set anything and doesn't influence anyone.So if your constant objection to everything I post is sincere, you should reconsider where our positions actually are in relation to one another. If your constant objection is a forum role-play thing, well, it's weirdly incongruent with our actual stances.Bullgrit</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bullgrit, post: 5245796, member: 31216"] As I make this post, it's less than half -- 48.86%. Heck, the "old school" poll got a couple answers over 50% and 60%. So, according to my own poll, my statement seems more accurate than not. What are the pejorative definitions? I could see an argument for the last in the list, but what other one do you consider pejorative? And "including yours, of course"? "Of course"? Look, it's pretty obvious by now, that you have some kind of personal hang up over me. The only time you ever respond to one of my posts is to suggest that I'm in some way biased against a subject. Somewhere along the line of this forum, you got the idea that we hold opposing views on everything D&D. I don't know how you got that idea, as I find most comments you make about D&D in line with my own thoughts, feelings, experiences, and preferences. I've even given xp to some of your posts. I don't know, maybe you've decided to play a role around here as "Bullgrit's constant opposition." It's just weird for you to be in that role when we actually have a lot of the same feelings about the subject we discuss around here. I seem to have more actual play experiences in common with you than I do with some folks who have never stated disagreement with anything I've ever posted. You have a problem with how I define grognard? You think my definition is negative? Well, I've never called you, (or anyone that I can remember), a grognard. You call yourself a grognard? Well, realize that less than 22% of the people here define it the way you want it. Even removing my "of course" vote, the "confrontational and rejecting" opinion outnumbers the "accepting and embracing" opinion by 23-3. My lone opinion on the definition doesn't set anything and doesn't influence anyone. So if your constant objection to everything I post is sincere, you should reconsider where our positions actually are in relation to one another. If your constant objection is a forum role-play thing, well, it's weirdly incongruent with our actual stances. Bullgrit [/QUOTE]

Verification