Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3915638" data-attributes="member: 2067">To me, 3e was only theoreticlaly Greyhawk. I don't know Greyhawk. I don't play in Greyhawk. I took 3e and played it in Nyambe, in the Northern Crown, in Sigil, in Cthulu-infested FR, in Rokugan, in postapocalyptic Road-Warrior-esque wastelands, in primoridal soup....All without really changing the core rules.4e appears to be much more closely tied to the metasetting than 3e is.If it's NOT more closely tied, the whole OP is nonsense, because 3e defined it's own mythology, too.If it IS more closely tied (and I agree with the OP that this is something 4e appears to be trying to do), it may mean that it will be more difficult for DMs to make it their own.3e wasn't really Greyhawk unless Greyhawk is &quot;a hodge podge of fantasy influences overlayed with buckles, peircings, and tatoos.&quot; I don't really think it was.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3915638, member: 2067"] To me, 3e was only theoreticlaly Greyhawk. I don't know Greyhawk. I don't play in Greyhawk. I took 3e and played it in Nyambe, in the Northern Crown, in Sigil, in Cthulu-infested FR, in Rokugan, in postapocalyptic [I]Road-Warrior[/I]-esque wastelands, in primoridal soup.... All without really changing the core rules. 4e appears to be much more closely tied to the metasetting than 3e is. If it's NOT more closely tied, the whole OP is nonsense, because 3e defined it's own mythology, too. If it IS more closely tied (and I agree with the OP that this is something 4e appears to be trying to do), it may mean that it will be more difficult for DMs to make it their own. 3e wasn't really Greyhawk unless Greyhawk is "a hodge podge of fantasy influences overlayed with buckles, peircings, and tatoos." I don't really think it was. [/QUOTE]

Verification