Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Defining its own Mythology
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AWizardInDallas" data-source="post: 3919603" data-attributes="member: 52605"><p>Keep seeing? Um, I only wrote it once. I also didn't bring up the monster manual format for playing monsters as races. Someone else did. You're welcome to think it's an unreasonable assumption as that's your opinion. I don't think it's that much of a stretch really and that's my opinion. However, looking at "late 3.5" (as someone else here termed it, in other words, suggesting a progression not a cut over) the notes for playing monster races as characters in the most recent monster manuals suggest less notes for playing monsters as characters not more (i.e. when compared to earlier books). WoTC is "streamlining" (as someone here also termed it) and doing so would run contrary to their design goal.</p><p></p><p>By the way, the racial foot noting in the monster manual is decidedly inconvenient. Once upon a time players were not supposed to read the monster manuals. Now players virtually have to if they want to locate additional racial options, even for as mild a change as high elf to wood elf. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> That simple option, my friends, used to be in the good old 1E PHB. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>D&D used to be fairly encyclopedic and it's not anymore; we should be seeing a convenient, generous catalog of core races not just a handful. D&D has been around for over thirty years and still the PHB contains only a handful of races. Why? Supplements make money.</p><p></p><p>Anyway my players and I have reached consensus and we won't be playing 4E as we dislike the changes were seeing in general. I may entertain buying a third party D20 system with a better design philosophy and certainly more core race as well as class options.</p><p></p><p>The good news is the stuff we like is about to get a whole lot cheeper. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AWizardInDallas, post: 3919603, member: 52605"] Keep seeing? Um, I only wrote it once. I also didn't bring up the monster manual format for playing monsters as races. Someone else did. You're welcome to think it's an unreasonable assumption as that's your opinion. I don't think it's that much of a stretch really and that's my opinion. However, looking at "late 3.5" (as someone else here termed it, in other words, suggesting a progression not a cut over) the notes for playing monster races as characters in the most recent monster manuals suggest less notes for playing monsters as characters not more (i.e. when compared to earlier books). WoTC is "streamlining" (as someone here also termed it) and doing so would run contrary to their design goal. By the way, the racial foot noting in the monster manual is decidedly inconvenient. Once upon a time players were not supposed to read the monster manuals. Now players virtually have to if they want to locate additional racial options, even for as mild a change as high elf to wood elf. :( That simple option, my friends, used to be in the good old 1E PHB. :) D&D used to be fairly encyclopedic and it's not anymore; we should be seeing a convenient, generous catalog of core races not just a handful. D&D has been around for over thirty years and still the PHB contains only a handful of races. Why? Supplements make money. Anyway my players and I have reached consensus and we won't be playing 4E as we dislike the changes were seeing in general. I may entertain buying a third party D20 system with a better design philosophy and certainly more core race as well as class options. The good news is the stuff we like is about to get a whole lot cheeper. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Defining its own Mythology
Top