Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Defining "New School" Play (+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9386378" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>I get immediately, viscerally cautious whenever some states that there is no idea of consent, and that someone in power can have whatever they want to have happen, happen. If your players enjoy the adversity, then they will consent to whatever you have planned. IF you aren't asking them, because you don't want to hear them say no... then there might be a problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Would they? Or would they simply feel like there is no reason to rock the boat? You stated to my example of working with my DM to find a good sacrifice for my character's story that many if not most players don't want to lose things... and yet you also claim that plenty perhaps even most of OS players would be fine losing their entire character. There is certainly a disconnect here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is a problem to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, no. You specifically are pointing out "chosen ones" but that isn't how New School players make their characters. We do not make characters chosen by destiny. </p><p></p><p>Even the idea that Old School characters are "Everymen" is pretty suspect. Mordenkainen is an Old School character, played at Gygax's table. He is an archmage who has risen to the point of challenging gods and keeping balance in the multiverse. Now, you might challenge that he had to rise to that position... but so do all of our characters. My Fey Warlock Tharivol was a normal guy, who made a marriage pact with a Fey Lady. It even turned out that she had multiple simultaneous pacts, and every single one of them was "Tharivol". He had no special beginnings, but he was going to be an immortal Fey Lord sitting at the center of a rebuilt civilization... because the game was about rebuilding civilization. </p><p></p><p>We do acknowledge we are making protagonists, but that is very different. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It can, I would say that New School does tend to lean more into having plots, as part of the character's being protagonists. The DM has a villain for them to fight, has an end goal of some sort to reach. But even Old School has this to a degree. You can't actually adventure endlessly, because you eventually max level the character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9386378, member: 6801228"] I get immediately, viscerally cautious whenever some states that there is no idea of consent, and that someone in power can have whatever they want to have happen, happen. If your players enjoy the adversity, then they will consent to whatever you have planned. IF you aren't asking them, because you don't want to hear them say no... then there might be a problem. Would they? Or would they simply feel like there is no reason to rock the boat? You stated to my example of working with my DM to find a good sacrifice for my character's story that many if not most players don't want to lose things... and yet you also claim that plenty perhaps even most of OS players would be fine losing their entire character. There is certainly a disconnect here. That is a problem to me. Actually, no. You specifically are pointing out "chosen ones" but that isn't how New School players make their characters. We do not make characters chosen by destiny. Even the idea that Old School characters are "Everymen" is pretty suspect. Mordenkainen is an Old School character, played at Gygax's table. He is an archmage who has risen to the point of challenging gods and keeping balance in the multiverse. Now, you might challenge that he had to rise to that position... but so do all of our characters. My Fey Warlock Tharivol was a normal guy, who made a marriage pact with a Fey Lady. It even turned out that she had multiple simultaneous pacts, and every single one of them was "Tharivol". He had no special beginnings, but he was going to be an immortal Fey Lord sitting at the center of a rebuilt civilization... because the game was about rebuilding civilization. We do acknowledge we are making protagonists, but that is very different. It can, I would say that New School does tend to lean more into having plots, as part of the character's being protagonists. The DM has a villain for them to fight, has an end goal of some sort to reach. But even Old School has this to a degree. You can't actually adventure endlessly, because you eventually max level the character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Defining "New School" Play (+)
Top