Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Degrees of Success
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 6500807" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>In O.L.D. and N.E.W., a successful attribute check is used to hit a difficulty benchmark. A success means that an activity has been successfully completed. Breaking down a door, climbing a wall, picking a lock, bandaging a wound. You're probably familiar with the standard benchmarks by now.<p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Easy [7]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Routine [10]</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Challenging [13]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Difficult [16]</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Demanding [21]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Strenuous [25]</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Severe [29]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Herculean [33]</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Superhuman [37]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Impossible [40]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Mythical [45]</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p></p><p>So, as you already know, it's easy for a GM to call for a Difficult attribute check, and a starting character limited to 5d6 dice pools will not normally be able to exceed a Severe check. You'll generally only use the bolded benchmarks unless you need more granularity for something.</p><p></p><p>But what happens if you greatly exceed a benchmark when making an attribute check? Well, that's where degrees of success come into play. For every benchmark above the target, the task is completed with greater aplomb.</p><p></p><p>Less than benchmark - task failed*</p><p>+0 benchmark - marginal success; the task is completed, but something might have gone slightly awry</p><p>+1 benchmark - clear success; the task is completed with no setbacks or other issues</p><p>+2 benchmarks - perfect success; the task is completed with expertise and some kind of small added benefit is achieved</p><p>+3 benchmarks - critical success; not only is the task completed, but a additional major benefit is gained</p><p></p><p>For example, hacking into a computer system to remotely unlock a cell door might be a Difficult [16] task. Holmes sits down and starts hacking away, rolling a rather impressive 26 on his 6d6 - a <em>strenuous </em>result. As that's two benchmarks higher than <em>difficult</em>, he's gotten a perfect success. He gets some kind of small added benefit; the GM rules than he has also managed to avoid setting off any alarms systems. If he'd gotten a critical success (by rolling 29 or more), he'd have an additional major benefit; perhaps he not only unlocked the cell door but also managed to lock the security guards in their office!</p><p></p><p>[TABLE="class: outer_border, width: 500"] [TR] [TD]<span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>*Optional Rule: Failing Forward</strong></span></p><p>Sometimes having the characters fail to navigate to the next star system, or open the door to Moria, can stop or slow down play. After all, the drama is what's in the next star system, or what happened in Moria; the drama isn't inherent in the door or the tedious navigation. For that reason, the fail forward rule should be used.</p><p></p><p>What that means is that when the character does not succeed with the die roll the character does not fail at the task. The next star system is reached, or the door is opened. The story continues. </p><p></p><p>However, a major setback occurs at the same time. Perhaps the starship engines are burnt out upon arrival (requiring the PC to locate spare parts and repair them) or a large monster is awoken in the pool outside the door. </p><p></p><p>This never applies to attack rolls.</p><p>[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 6500807, member: 1"] In O.L.D. and N.E.W., a successful attribute check is used to hit a difficulty benchmark. A success means that an activity has been successfully completed. Breaking down a door, climbing a wall, picking a lock, bandaging a wound. You're probably familiar with the standard benchmarks by now.[INDENT] Easy [7] [B]Routine [10][/B] Challenging [13] [B]Difficult [16][/B] Demanding [21] [B]Strenuous [25][/B] Severe [29] [B]Herculean [33][/B] Superhuman [37] Impossible [40] Mythical [45] [/INDENT] So, as you already know, it's easy for a GM to call for a Difficult attribute check, and a starting character limited to 5d6 dice pools will not normally be able to exceed a Severe check. You'll generally only use the bolded benchmarks unless you need more granularity for something. But what happens if you greatly exceed a benchmark when making an attribute check? Well, that's where degrees of success come into play. For every benchmark above the target, the task is completed with greater aplomb. Less than benchmark - task failed* +0 benchmark - marginal success; the task is completed, but something might have gone slightly awry +1 benchmark - clear success; the task is completed with no setbacks or other issues +2 benchmarks - perfect success; the task is completed with expertise and some kind of small added benefit is achieved +3 benchmarks - critical success; not only is the task completed, but a additional major benefit is gained For example, hacking into a computer system to remotely unlock a cell door might be a Difficult [16] task. Holmes sits down and starts hacking away, rolling a rather impressive 26 on his 6d6 - a [I]strenuous [/I]result. As that's two benchmarks higher than [I]difficult[/I], he's gotten a perfect success. He gets some kind of small added benefit; the GM rules than he has also managed to avoid setting off any alarms systems. If he'd gotten a critical success (by rolling 29 or more), he'd have an additional major benefit; perhaps he not only unlocked the cell door but also managed to lock the security guards in their office! [TABLE="class: outer_border, width: 500"] [TR] [TD][SIZE=3][B]*Optional Rule: Failing Forward[/B][/SIZE] Sometimes having the characters fail to navigate to the next star system, or open the door to Moria, can stop or slow down play. After all, the drama is what's in the next star system, or what happened in Moria; the drama isn't inherent in the door or the tedious navigation. For that reason, the fail forward rule should be used. What that means is that when the character does not succeed with the die roll the character does not fail at the task. The next star system is reached, or the door is opened. The story continues. However, a major setback occurs at the same time. Perhaps the starship engines are burnt out upon arrival (requiring the PC to locate spare parts and repair them) or a large monster is awoken in the pool outside the door. This never applies to attack rolls. [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Degrees of Success
Top