Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Deleted
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9365405" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>And thus why we abandoned the old-school paladin, and went with the better version of it in modern times. The version that isn't a default Tragic Figure "because doing good should be something that leads to tragedy and being a hard man making hard choices". </p><p></p><p>To me, the point of playing a paladin is to be the big blue boyscout. To be the person who always does the right thing, who refuses to bend the knee to forces of harm or destruction. The idea of being in a situation where I have to decide "do I do the the right and good thing, or do I follow my oath" with a paladin is ludicrous, because if the oath is getting in the way of doing the right thing, it isn't a good oath. </p><p></p><p>Now, I'm fine with someone like the Oath of the Crown Paladin or the Oath of Glory Paladin being more devoted to their oaths instead of doing good, or for evil paladins to stick by their oaths instead of doing the right thing, because those are slightly different concepts. But the traditional Devotion Paladin archetype should never be in a situation where they must be torn between their oath and the correct course of action. </p><p></p><p>Now, this isn't to say they should never be challenged, but it isn't THAT hard to find solutions to these issues. "Do I lie and save these orphan children from death, or do I tell the truth and sentence them to death...." Neither! Why are these your only options?! How about "These four children are the newest acolytes of my order. I have taken responsibility for training them to be fine followers of Pelor. If they have previously done wrong, I shall endeavor to right the scales, as is my responsibility as their teacher." Is that a lie? Not if the paladin is honestly planning on taking in these orphans and becoming responsible for their training and teaching. Which isn't an easy thing to do, but it also isn't sentencing them to death. And presenting and thinking about it only in a black or black outlook, where both options are terrible... isn't what the paladin should be about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9365405, member: 6801228"] And thus why we abandoned the old-school paladin, and went with the better version of it in modern times. The version that isn't a default Tragic Figure "because doing good should be something that leads to tragedy and being a hard man making hard choices". To me, the point of playing a paladin is to be the big blue boyscout. To be the person who always does the right thing, who refuses to bend the knee to forces of harm or destruction. The idea of being in a situation where I have to decide "do I do the the right and good thing, or do I follow my oath" with a paladin is ludicrous, because if the oath is getting in the way of doing the right thing, it isn't a good oath. Now, I'm fine with someone like the Oath of the Crown Paladin or the Oath of Glory Paladin being more devoted to their oaths instead of doing good, or for evil paladins to stick by their oaths instead of doing the right thing, because those are slightly different concepts. But the traditional Devotion Paladin archetype should never be in a situation where they must be torn between their oath and the correct course of action. Now, this isn't to say they should never be challenged, but it isn't THAT hard to find solutions to these issues. "Do I lie and save these orphan children from death, or do I tell the truth and sentence them to death...." Neither! Why are these your only options?! How about "These four children are the newest acolytes of my order. I have taken responsibility for training them to be fine followers of Pelor. If they have previously done wrong, I shall endeavor to right the scales, as is my responsibility as their teacher." Is that a lie? Not if the paladin is honestly planning on taking in these orphans and becoming responsible for their training and teaching. Which isn't an easy thing to do, but it also isn't sentencing them to death. And presenting and thinking about it only in a black or black outlook, where both options are terrible... isn't what the paladin should be about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Deleted
Top