Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 2857494" data-attributes="member: 172">Knowing the Yugoloths, this is just as likely to be screed.One thing I really appreciated about Faces of Evil, probably the last &quot;definitive&quot; work on fiends as a whole, is that while it fuelled you with lots of ideas, it came across from an angle of a mortal sage in a setting in which the premise was that anything about yugoloths (or well, any fiends, but especially yugoloths) was just as likely to be true or false. So it was a book that it was safe to let your players get snippets of without having to worry about whether anything it said out of necessity and obesience to canon would invalidate the GMs game.That said, the spine of a god thing is sort of cool... I think it would be a fun thing to plot out an adventure around how this really happened. And again, knowing the yugoloths, the entire event would not be something that is forcasted in CRs or stat blocks, but very sly trickery.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Psion, post: 2857494, member: 172"] Knowing the Yugoloths, this is just as likely to be screed. One thing I really appreciated about Faces of Evil, probably the last "definitive" work on fiends as a whole, is that while it fuelled you with lots of ideas, it came across from an angle of a mortal sage in a setting in which the premise was that anything about yugoloths (or well, any fiends, but especially yugoloths) was just as likely to be true or false. So it was a book that it was safe to let your players get snippets of without having to worry about whether anything it said out of necessity and obesience to canon would invalidate the GMs game. That said, the spine of a god thing is sort of cool... I think it would be a fun thing to plot out an adventure around how this really happened. And again, knowing the yugoloths, the entire event would not be something that is forcasted in CRs or stat blocks, but very sly trickery. [/QUOTE]

Verification