Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Demon Lords and Princes: How *Bad* Should They Be?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kain Darkwind" data-source="post: 2858825" data-attributes="member: 23011"><p>Gosh golly gee, you are right! That must be why I am <em>asking the other side to explain their position while explaining my own</em>. And I have yet to hear a solid reason for a base line demon lord that is under a balor's CR. I'm beginning to think that there actually isn't one. And I've read all the posts in the two threads on the matter, including yours. I've heard the idea that stats higher than what is presented in FC are worthless because players can't beat them. I've heard the idea that the entire cosmos should be reset to lower levels all around. I've yet to hear how the current cosmos works with the current stats. And I'd like to hear it. Saying I won't understand is running away from the matter at hand. Give me your explanation if it is different and better than the other ones I've heard. If I don't agree with someone's explanation, I'll say so. What I'm concerned about with this farce is that there has been no explanation other than the lame one of "so we could make them playable by everyone" No one has said that the gods need to be lowered to those levels. No one has said that great wyrms need to be lowered. (Well, a few people did, and that's fine, but that's still a change to the cosmos for the sake of compatibility...just in the opposite direction of mine)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right. And I heard that. What I'm saying, is that putting a baseline that low (HD 20-27) is foolishness. We can debate whether or not Demogorgon should be CR 30 or CR 50, but I think everyone agrees he should be significantly more powerful than a balor, no matter what, right? And poor Jubilex should be too.</p><p></p><p>It's not about making it a toolkit decision. You can do that and still maintain cohesion throughout the material. For instance, dragons. Need a weak dragon? Wyrmling. Need a powerful one? Adult. Need an epic one? Great Wyrm. Need an even more powerful epic one? Advancement table.</p><p></p><p>The demon lords had something like that as well. Aspects. If you wanted a mid to high level challenge with a demon prince, you could use an aspect. Base line were CR 9-11, if I remember correctly. They could have presented aspects, clearly stated as such, for the CR 20-23 crowd. The fact that they didn't implies that they do not consider demon princes more powerful than great wyrms. Despite the flavor, despite the history, despite the common sense that says "balors < demon princes", they chose to go a different route. A route that makes no cosmological sense. A route which has not been adequately explained without metagame concepts by its defenders.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kain Darkwind, post: 2858825, member: 23011"] Gosh golly gee, you are right! That must be why I am [i]asking the other side to explain their position while explaining my own[/i]. And I have yet to hear a solid reason for a base line demon lord that is under a balor's CR. I'm beginning to think that there actually isn't one. And I've read all the posts in the two threads on the matter, including yours. I've heard the idea that stats higher than what is presented in FC are worthless because players can't beat them. I've heard the idea that the entire cosmos should be reset to lower levels all around. I've yet to hear how the current cosmos works with the current stats. And I'd like to hear it. Saying I won't understand is running away from the matter at hand. Give me your explanation if it is different and better than the other ones I've heard. If I don't agree with someone's explanation, I'll say so. What I'm concerned about with this farce is that there has been no explanation other than the lame one of "so we could make them playable by everyone" No one has said that the gods need to be lowered to those levels. No one has said that great wyrms need to be lowered. (Well, a few people did, and that's fine, but that's still a change to the cosmos for the sake of compatibility...just in the opposite direction of mine) Right. And I heard that. What I'm saying, is that putting a baseline that low (HD 20-27) is foolishness. We can debate whether or not Demogorgon should be CR 30 or CR 50, but I think everyone agrees he should be significantly more powerful than a balor, no matter what, right? And poor Jubilex should be too. It's not about making it a toolkit decision. You can do that and still maintain cohesion throughout the material. For instance, dragons. Need a weak dragon? Wyrmling. Need a powerful one? Adult. Need an epic one? Great Wyrm. Need an even more powerful epic one? Advancement table. The demon lords had something like that as well. Aspects. If you wanted a mid to high level challenge with a demon prince, you could use an aspect. Base line were CR 9-11, if I remember correctly. They could have presented aspects, clearly stated as such, for the CR 20-23 crowd. The fact that they didn't implies that they do not consider demon princes more powerful than great wyrms. Despite the flavor, despite the history, despite the common sense that says "balors < demon princes", they chose to go a different route. A route that makes no cosmological sense. A route which has not been adequately explained without metagame concepts by its defenders. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Demon Lords and Princes: How *Bad* Should They Be?
Top