Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Demoralize as a Standard Action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Water Bob" data-source="post: 5897637" data-attributes="member: 92305"><p>The demoralize opponent option of the Intimidate skill was one of the first things that made me smile when I first began to read 3E (really, 3.5E).</p><p> </p><p>I thought to myself, "Man! Cool! They finally put something like a 'mental edge' into the game--brain-f%^king your opponent."</p><p> </p><p>But, as written, it's not a very practical use of the skill, right? Who wants to give up an attack just in order to have a chance at getting your opponent shaken for one round?</p><p> </p><p>I turned to the Pathfinder tweaked version of the manevuer, which makes some welcome adjustments (increased range and your opponent shaken for additional rounds if your roll is high enough).</p><p> </p><p>Still, though, the act of demoralizing an opponent is a standard action. In a lot of cases (under 6th level, for example), this means no attack--being "intimidating" instead of attacking.</p><p> </p><p>That doesn't make sense to me. A lot of opponents are intimidating just by the way they look. </p><p> </p><p>Look at this scary bastard...</p><p> </p><p><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-AUBcZ0RYnf8/SuTD8pV22CI/AAAAAAAAAts/svGNU1i5FFw/AOC_BearShaman_PVP.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p> </p><p>If I see that sucker coming out of the woods, gunning for "me", I think there's a chance that I'm intimidated! I might be shaken a round or two!</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>So, take the guy in the pic. Imagine him charging, running straight for you, screaming his head off.</p><p> </p><p>Shouldn't that call for a Demoralize Other roll?</p><p> </p><p>Mechanically, this is illegal because, if the foe is charging, he can't also use a Standard Action (plus his attack at the end of the charge).</p><p> </p><p>But, shouldn't there be a chance that the object of this guy's charge will start quakeing in his boots, wishing his day had gone a different direction?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>My question to you is: Should Demoralize other be a Standard Action?</p><p> </p><p>Does this need to be House Ruled?</p><p> </p><p>Should I allow this particular Standard Action to be combined with other actions, like movement? (Similar to how drawing your weapon can be combined with movement?)</p><p> </p><p>Thoughts?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>EDIT: Maybe it should be a Swift Action? Or, how about a Move Action, but like drawing a weapon, can be combined with movement?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Water Bob, post: 5897637, member: 92305"] The demoralize opponent option of the Intimidate skill was one of the first things that made me smile when I first began to read 3E (really, 3.5E). I thought to myself, "Man! Cool! They finally put something like a 'mental edge' into the game--brain-f%^king your opponent." But, as written, it's not a very practical use of the skill, right? Who wants to give up an attack just in order to have a chance at getting your opponent shaken for one round? I turned to the Pathfinder tweaked version of the manevuer, which makes some welcome adjustments (increased range and your opponent shaken for additional rounds if your roll is high enough). Still, though, the act of demoralizing an opponent is a standard action. In a lot of cases (under 6th level, for example), this means no attack--being "intimidating" instead of attacking. That doesn't make sense to me. A lot of opponents are intimidating just by the way they look. Look at this scary bastard... [IMG]http://lh5.ggpht.com/-AUBcZ0RYnf8/SuTD8pV22CI/AAAAAAAAAts/svGNU1i5FFw/AOC_BearShaman_PVP.jpg[/IMG] If I see that sucker coming out of the woods, gunning for "me", I think there's a chance that I'm intimidated! I might be shaken a round or two! So, take the guy in the pic. Imagine him charging, running straight for you, screaming his head off. Shouldn't that call for a Demoralize Other roll? Mechanically, this is illegal because, if the foe is charging, he can't also use a Standard Action (plus his attack at the end of the charge). But, shouldn't there be a chance that the object of this guy's charge will start quakeing in his boots, wishing his day had gone a different direction? My question to you is: Should Demoralize other be a Standard Action? Does this need to be House Ruled? Should I allow this particular Standard Action to be combined with other actions, like movement? (Similar to how drawing your weapon can be combined with movement?) Thoughts? EDIT: Maybe it should be a Swift Action? Or, how about a Move Action, but like drawing a weapon, can be combined with movement? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Demoralize as a Standard Action
Top