Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Velmont" data-source="post: 4502537" data-attributes="member: 13739">Kerry grabs the photocpy and starts to read it. "Nothing we havn't found. We could have wrote that autopsie with our conclusion... but that handwrited note confirm my doubt. Good thing I didn't spoke to Grabowsky." He hands the photocopy to his teammate. "You see, the man have been killed by a violent biofeedback. I can assure you that guy is no abberant, I didn't saw any trace of taint in him. But that corpse had no bioware. He was missing some muscles too. The only known bioware that can replace muscle are made to help hadicaped people. Those bioware are not strong enough to cause such biofeedback. It needs to be a more powerfull device. I think our friends of Beaulac clinic knows exactly what replaced the mucles of our John Doe. That's why Grabowsky was so angry. He didn't want Trinity to find out. Grabowsky and Mangels, the one who has make teh note, are both known for there papers on the taint. I think our friends have made some research on the taint even if the scientific community doesn't like that idea. I wouldn't be surprised our John Doe was a subject with abberant bioware and as the guy died, our friends of Beaulac clinic have removed the bioware. That would also explain the clean removal of those muscles.What do you think about that theory?"</blockquote>