Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dragonblade" data-source="post: 3877157" data-attributes="member: 2804">Here is my take on the roles:When I think Controller, I think &quot;artillery&quot;. The ability to inflict lots of damage to a lot of enemies quickly all over the battlefield. Hence my desire to see an Archer class as a Martial Controller. The ability to alter the battlefield terrain itself would also qualify. Controller damage is good, but the main benefit should be in being able to damage multiple foes in a round at range. Controllers also would be the most vulnerable class, followed by the Striker as the second most vulnerable.When I think Striker, I think fast and agile but not able to take a lot of punishment. However, a striker should deal massive damage (the most in the game) when fighting one on one and should be able to move all over the battlefield with ease.When I think Defender, I think armored tank. Someone who can take a ton of punishment but also deal a ton of punishment for those who get into melee with one. Should be able to do more damage than anyone but a Striker when fighting one on one.When I think Leader, I think a class that can complement all the roles but also stand by itself. Tougher than a Controller or Striker, but not as tough as a Defender. Does more damage one on one than a Controller, but not as much as a Defender or a Striker. However should have the best ability to recover damage and to boost themselves and allies. Should also be more mobile than anyone but a Striker.--------Also posted here:<a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=211427&amp;page=2" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=211427&amp;page=2</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dragonblade, post: 3877157, member: 2804"] Here is my take on the roles: When I think Controller, I think "artillery". The ability to inflict lots of damage to a lot of enemies quickly all over the battlefield. Hence my desire to see an Archer class as a Martial Controller. The ability to alter the battlefield terrain itself would also qualify. Controller damage is good, but the main benefit should be in being able to damage multiple foes in a round at range. Controllers also would be the most vulnerable class, followed by the Striker as the second most vulnerable. When I think Striker, I think fast and agile but not able to take a lot of punishment. However, a striker should deal massive damage (the most in the game) when fighting one on one and should be able to move all over the battlefield with ease. When I think Defender, I think armored tank. Someone who can take a ton of punishment but also deal a ton of punishment for those who get into melee with one. Should be able to do more damage than anyone but a Striker when fighting one on one. When I think Leader, I think a class that can complement all the roles but also stand by itself. Tougher than a Controller or Striker, but not as tough as a Defender. Does more damage one on one than a Controller, but not as much as a Defender or a Striker. However should have the best ability to recover damage and to boost themselves and allies. Should also be more mobile than anyone but a Striker. -------- Also posted here: [url]http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=211427&page=2[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification