Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Design & Development: Quests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 3902261" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Didn't see it included in that article, though, did you? Neither did I.</p><p></p><p>Simply because our information about any facet at this point is incomplete does not mean that we shouldn't point out potential pitfalls. If the designers have already considered them, great! If not, then they get the opportunity. Win/win.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Semantics? In order to see what the article said, and whether or not your ideas were in accordance with it, I broke down the system the article was talking about. Something doesn't have to be a rule to be a system. For that matter, something doesn't have to be a system to be a rule.</p><p></p><p>When someone says something along the lines of </p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">I didn't read anywhere in the article that quest cards were going to be a "system" as others have unintentionally (or intentionally) labelled it.</p><p></p><p>they strongly imply that a point is merely semantical (as you are now, seemingly, also trying to do), and that it is unimportant as a result. Moreover, that "unintentionally (or intentionally)" implies some sort of wrongdoing, which is (frankly) bizarre.</p><p></p><p>However, if the D&D article was the basis of the DMG text (and didn't contain expansions such as the ones I suggested earlier), neither your (apparently) nor my preferred use of Quest Cards would be suggested. In fact, none of the good uses of Quest Cards in this thread would be suggested -- all falling outside the system presented -- which would be a disservice to new DMs (or DMs without internet access!).</p><p></p><p>I mean, really, what part of </p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">(1) Discuss how Quest Cards might lead to railroading, with advice on avoiding the same. Less experienced, and especially new, DMs need some solid guidelines on the pitfalls of railroading. This applies doubly for DMs who cut their teeth on 3.X.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">(2) Discuss an alternate where the players can devise personal goals, and earn story XP for them. This should include personal goals at odds with DM Quest Cards.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">(3) Ensure that you have a good, clear description of how to determine XP for Quests. This is by far the hardest of the three (in fact, I have never seen it done well), and must be clear enough that a DM allowing players to determine personal goals can easily decide what XP are appropriate.</p><p></p><p>do you people find so distasteful?</p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 3902261, member: 18280"] Didn't see it included in that article, though, did you? Neither did I. Simply because our information about any facet at this point is incomplete does not mean that we shouldn't point out potential pitfalls. If the designers have already considered them, great! If not, then they get the opportunity. Win/win. Semantics? In order to see what the article said, and whether or not your ideas were in accordance with it, I broke down the system the article was talking about. Something doesn't have to be a rule to be a system. For that matter, something doesn't have to be a system to be a rule. When someone says something along the lines of [indent]I didn't read anywhere in the article that quest cards were going to be a "system" as others have unintentionally (or intentionally) labelled it.[/indent] they strongly imply that a point is merely semantical (as you are now, seemingly, also trying to do), and that it is unimportant as a result. Moreover, that "unintentionally (or intentionally)" implies some sort of wrongdoing, which is (frankly) bizarre. However, if the D&D article was the basis of the DMG text (and didn't contain expansions such as the ones I suggested earlier), neither your (apparently) nor my preferred use of Quest Cards would be suggested. In fact, none of the good uses of Quest Cards in this thread would be suggested -- all falling outside the system presented -- which would be a disservice to new DMs (or DMs without internet access!). I mean, really, what part of [indent](1) Discuss how Quest Cards might lead to railroading, with advice on avoiding the same. Less experienced, and especially new, DMs need some solid guidelines on the pitfalls of railroading. This applies doubly for DMs who cut their teeth on 3.X. (2) Discuss an alternate where the players can devise personal goals, and earn story XP for them. This should include personal goals at odds with DM Quest Cards. (3) Ensure that you have a good, clear description of how to determine XP for Quests. This is by far the hardest of the three (in fact, I have never seen it done well), and must be clear enough that a DM allowing players to determine personal goals can easily decide what XP are appropriate.[/indent] do you people find so distasteful? RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Design & Development: Quests
Top