Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3915299" data-attributes="member: 48965">The opposite is not supported by the article either.&nbsp; If it turns out this way great...if a blog that adresses and supports this pops up that's great too.&nbsp; But I'm going by what is presented in the article not by others interpretation of what the quest mechanic will encompass.&nbsp; In fact the blog by Mearls actually supports the opposite of what you're claiming.While totally avoiding the fact that xp is always assigned to these &quot;quests&quot; so no it's not just a reminder...it's a push nudge or whatever to do this thing, whatever it may be, as opposed to something which isn't a quest, but you may want to do.Glass houses and all because there are a few posters I recognize as unconditionally supporting everything presented about 4e...hmm wonder who?&nbsp; I haven't even posted in the 4e threads that much, and in the polls have always voted undecided as to whether I will play it or not.&nbsp; So these types of generalizations can swing both ways.&nbsp; Better to just avoid them, don't you think?Emphasis mine... In the end this is the crux of the argument.&nbsp; Numerous pro-posters are in fact acting like this is fact when their has been no present evidence to back this up.&nbsp; As far as tweaking...well that's great but it's not what is being debated.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 3915299, member: 48965"] The opposite is not supported by the article either. If it turns out this way great...if a blog that adresses and supports this pops up that's great too. But I'm going by what is presented in the article not by others interpretation of what the quest mechanic will encompass. In fact the blog by Mearls actually supports the opposite of what you're claiming. While totally avoiding the fact that xp is always assigned to these "quests" so no it's not just a reminder...it's a push nudge or whatever to do this thing, whatever it may be, as opposed to something which isn't a quest, but you may want to do. Glass houses and all because there are a few posters I recognize as unconditionally supporting everything presented about 4e...hmm wonder who? I haven't even posted in the 4e threads that much, and in the polls have always voted undecided as to whether I will play it or not. So these types of generalizations can swing both ways. Better to just avoid them, don't you think? Emphasis mine... In the end this is the crux of the argument. Numerous pro-posters are in fact acting like this is fact when their has been no present evidence to back this up. As far as tweaking...well that's great but it's not what is being debated. [/QUOTE]

Verification