Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hopeless" data-source="post: 3828645" data-attributes="member: 36349">Hmm...In short this would work fine IF it had been a prestige class however it evidently isn't so you're having obvious trouble devising a way for it to fit.Perfectly understandable the warlock should have been a prestige class in 3.5, there were far better choices than it for that class role like the wild mage for example that was an optional class in 2e became a prestige class in 3.0+ and yet deserves better but it was never a case of should it have been it was more of a case "Hey this cool lets make it a core class" instead of "with these mechanics its better served as a prestige class, say lets correct the mistake made on the sorceror and fuse the favoured sould bck together with it so it can cast a limited no of spells but can choose from arcane and divine..." as it should hav in the first place!Sorry wandering off the thread however aptly perhaps you can reply with what character type you fancy and see if we can't help you resolve the problems inherent.At least we might get to see a proper background instead of a core class that involves the character having bound themselves to some extraplanar deity or force of malevolent nature given how its described.</blockquote>