Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Design & Development: The Warlock
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paraxis" data-source="post: 3832584" data-attributes="member: 13009"><p>Let me try to explain my thoughts better, killing can be done for a good cause. IMHO.</p><p>Execution of convictied murderers, war fought against forces of evil, self defense, ect....</p><p></p><p>A fighter is a professional killer it's what the class is all about, but who he kills, why he kills, and even how he kills makes a huge difference. A soldier who is a sniper compared to a professional hitman are completly different people or characters. </p><p></p><p>The flavor of the Warlock suggests heavly to me that, his/her motivation for killing is to gain more power from the being the warlock made a pact with, in the case of atleast 1/3rd of them maybe more of these beings are all infernal powers of pure evil. Shadow and Feral again to me don't sound much better.</p><p></p><p>So a fighter who is a swashbuckler fighting for queen and country is vastly different then a warlock marking peoples souls and sending them to hell for a round and bringing them back.</p><p></p><p>A sword swing is only as dark as the heart of the man swinging it.</p><p></p><p>A blast of infernal hellfire is dark and evil no matter the motivations behind it because of where the power comes from.</p><p></p><p>I think I have expressed everything I can on the matter, those of you who like warlock my feelings won't change that, just like your feelings won't change mine. I just wanted to express my disapointment with WoTC who up untile this fluff piece had me 100% for 4E, and it's still hard for me to understand why the logic of making a paladin be a warrior for any diety didn't get applied to the new version of the warlock it just makes no sense to me.</p><p></p><p>I am still a 4E fanboy, and hope to have many enjoyable games with the system but I am unhappy about this class, and it's a major issue with me because a good section of the PHB will go to warlock powers just like to cleric and wizard spells, and it seems that the inclussion of the warlock pushed a more well rounded class out of the PHB. IMHO the warlock belongs in the DMG or a splat book, maybe even PHB2 where planar power sources could be touched on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paraxis, post: 3832584, member: 13009"] Let me try to explain my thoughts better, killing can be done for a good cause. IMHO. Execution of convictied murderers, war fought against forces of evil, self defense, ect.... A fighter is a professional killer it's what the class is all about, but who he kills, why he kills, and even how he kills makes a huge difference. A soldier who is a sniper compared to a professional hitman are completly different people or characters. The flavor of the Warlock suggests heavly to me that, his/her motivation for killing is to gain more power from the being the warlock made a pact with, in the case of atleast 1/3rd of them maybe more of these beings are all infernal powers of pure evil. Shadow and Feral again to me don't sound much better. So a fighter who is a swashbuckler fighting for queen and country is vastly different then a warlock marking peoples souls and sending them to hell for a round and bringing them back. A sword swing is only as dark as the heart of the man swinging it. A blast of infernal hellfire is dark and evil no matter the motivations behind it because of where the power comes from. I think I have expressed everything I can on the matter, those of you who like warlock my feelings won't change that, just like your feelings won't change mine. I just wanted to express my disapointment with WoTC who up untile this fluff piece had me 100% for 4E, and it's still hard for me to understand why the logic of making a paladin be a warrior for any diety didn't get applied to the new version of the warlock it just makes no sense to me. I am still a 4E fanboy, and hope to have many enjoyable games with the system but I am unhappy about this class, and it's a major issue with me because a good section of the PHB will go to warlock powers just like to cleric and wizard spells, and it seems that the inclussion of the warlock pushed a more well rounded class out of the PHB. IMHO the warlock belongs in the DMG or a splat book, maybe even PHB2 where planar power sources could be touched on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Design & Development: The Warlock
Top