Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ktulu" data-source="post: 4108162" data-attributes="member: 13465">Fierce & destructive clearly define what the attack does, to me.  I get the feeling that it's a lot of attacks with the intent of quickly and painfully ending the enemies life.Warlord bob to Fighter joe:  Coordinated pin against the ogre!Fighter Joe:  Did you just shout what you're doing?Warlord bob: No, I wanted you to help me pin him down so he couldn't get away (takes hit from ogre for not paying attention) Ouch!FJ: Why didn't you tell me?WB: I did!Warlord bob to fighter Joe: Joe, Pin the foe!FJ: Right, gotcha!I dunno, it sounds pretty good to me.  I'd have liked many of the abilities to be more like that (I can't, however, in good conscience suggest yelling White Raven Onslaught... You'd get beaten up)  I dunno, I don't like Shifting Onslaught.  It's boring.  It doesn't let me know what I'm doing any more than the other., so, by your example, if White Raven, the great Warlord from the north had designed this maneuver, you'd be ok with that?   :\ Repeating charge/lasting charge/staggered charge all sound boring though.  The Iron Dragon charge sounds like a tactic Bjorn the destroyer learned after battling the Iron Dragon, Ferros.  Exciting and imaginitive.  Not boring.I.e.Bjorn: Everyone, lasting charge formation, on my mark!orBjorn: Everyone, Iron Dragon Charge, on my mark!Again, it just sounds more exciting.  And it's not like you can't just change the name, anyway.  If you find Repeating Charge to be better, use it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification