Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Design & Development: Warlord Article UP!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Sessadore" data-source="post: 4108733" data-attributes="member: 57255"><p>THANK YOU. </p><p></p><p>To expand upon that, if every martial character's powers are vulnerable to the question of "why can't everyone do this?", then why even differentiate martial classes? Heck, why even differentiate classes at all??</p><p></p><p>Why is the ranger better with a bow than most everyone else? Why does only the fighter get to stop people from moving when he hits with OA's? Why does only the rogue get sneak attack? The same answer to those questions answers why only warlords can position their allies in the ways we see in their powers: because that is what they focus their training on. Just as rangers focus training with a bow, and rogues focus on being sneaky and striking when least expected. </p><p></p><p>If advanced tactical maneuvering and combat techniques are simple enough that one can simply "pick it up" through pure observation, why can't we all be Jackie Chan or Tony Jaa or Napoleon? </p><p></p><p>To broaden the point, why can't every wizard do what a warlord does? Why isn't every cleric as sneaky as a rogue then? If you want to justify it by saying that your characters are heroes and exceptionally above average, then why can't every fighter sling spells or pray with the same potency as clerics? They've certainly been around them long enough, had the time to observe enough magic usage that, if advanced combat techniques are truly that easy to master, they should know how to be a spell slinger by now, right?</p><p></p><p>I think the design philosophy behind the warlord powers (and every martial character's powers, and the powers system in general) is excellent. It takes time, practice, dedication, and a knack to pull off the things that these heroes do. It's not just something you can watch 1000 times and then be able to do yourself. And as soon as you bring "well, then, I practice it" into the picture, you're talking multiclass training - spending time developing the talents of another class, instead of advancing in your original field of expertise. </p><p></p><p>I guess the gist of what I'm trying to get at here is this: just because something is non-magical doesn't mean that it is easy, or even that any given person can accomplish the feat if they practice enough. They are extraordinary, and difficult.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Sessadore, post: 4108733, member: 57255"] THANK YOU. To expand upon that, if every martial character's powers are vulnerable to the question of "why can't everyone do this?", then why even differentiate martial classes? Heck, why even differentiate classes at all?? Why is the ranger better with a bow than most everyone else? Why does only the fighter get to stop people from moving when he hits with OA's? Why does only the rogue get sneak attack? The same answer to those questions answers why only warlords can position their allies in the ways we see in their powers: because that is what they focus their training on. Just as rangers focus training with a bow, and rogues focus on being sneaky and striking when least expected. If advanced tactical maneuvering and combat techniques are simple enough that one can simply "pick it up" through pure observation, why can't we all be Jackie Chan or Tony Jaa or Napoleon? To broaden the point, why can't every wizard do what a warlord does? Why isn't every cleric as sneaky as a rogue then? If you want to justify it by saying that your characters are heroes and exceptionally above average, then why can't every fighter sling spells or pray with the same potency as clerics? They've certainly been around them long enough, had the time to observe enough magic usage that, if advanced combat techniques are truly that easy to master, they should know how to be a spell slinger by now, right? I think the design philosophy behind the warlord powers (and every martial character's powers, and the powers system in general) is excellent. It takes time, practice, dedication, and a knack to pull off the things that these heroes do. It's not just something you can watch 1000 times and then be able to do yourself. And as soon as you bring "well, then, I practice it" into the picture, you're talking multiclass training - spending time developing the talents of another class, instead of advancing in your original field of expertise. I guess the gist of what I'm trying to get at here is this: just because something is non-magical doesn't mean that it is easy, or even that any given person can accomplish the feat if they practice enough. They are extraordinary, and difficult. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Design & Development: Warlord Article UP!
Top